Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research
Purpose Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) revealed indeterminate or conflicting study results. We aimed to systematically evaluate between-trial heterogeneity in reporting standards and trial outcome. Methods A systematic review of...
Main Authors: | Juschten, J, Tuinman, PR, Guo, T, Juffermans, NP, Schultz, MJ, Loer, SA, Girbes, ARJ, de Grooth, HJ |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021
|
Similar Items
-
Incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of early hyperbilirubinemia in critically ill patients: insights from the MARS Study
by: Juschten, J, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation by titrating inspiratory support to diaphragm effort: a randomized clinical trial
by: de Vries, HJ, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Consensus statements on the utility of defining ARDS and the utility of past and current definitions of ARDS—protocol for a Delphi study
by: Nasa, P, et al.
Published: (2024) -
RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
by: Algera, A, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Myocardial function during ventilation with lower versus higher positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS
by: Algera, AG, et al.
Published: (2022)