Methodological and practical issues regarding phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals: A response to Kumar
In his commentary on our article on phenomenological subtypes of highly suggestible individuals (Terhune and Cardeña, 2010), Kumar (2010) argues that methodological differences between our studies and previous research on highly suggestible subtypes temper our ability to link the two and that it is...
Main Authors: | Terhune, D, Cardena, E |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Similar Items
-
Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the phenomenology of consciousness inventory-hypnotic assessment procedure: A comment on Pekala et al. (2010a, 2010b)
by: Terhune, D, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility.
by: Terhune, D, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Heterogeneity in high hypnotic suggestibility and the neurophysiology of hypnosis.
by: Terhune, D, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility.
by: Terhune, D, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Disruption of synaesthesia by posthypnotic suggestion: an ERP study.
by: Terhune, D, et al.
Published: (2010)