Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.

BACKGROUND: Concern over the frequency of unintended harm to patients has focused attention on the importance of teamwork and communication in avoiding errors. This has led to experiments with teamwork training programmes for clinical staff, mostly based on aviation models. These are widely assumed...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: McCulloch, P, Rathbone, J, Catchpole, K
Format: Journal article
Langue:English
Publié: 2011
_version_ 1826304672729661440
author McCulloch, P
Rathbone, J
Catchpole, K
author_facet McCulloch, P
Rathbone, J
Catchpole, K
author_sort McCulloch, P
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Concern over the frequency of unintended harm to patients has focused attention on the importance of teamwork and communication in avoiding errors. This has led to experiments with teamwork training programmes for clinical staff, mostly based on aviation models. These are widely assumed to be effective in improving patient safety, but the extent to which this assumption is justified by evidence remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review on the effects of teamwork training for clinical staff was performed. Information was sought on outcomes including staff attitudes, teamwork skills, technical performance, efficiency and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1036 relevant abstracts identified, 14 articles were analysed in detail: four randomized trials and ten non-randomized studies. Overall study quality was poor, with particular problems over blinding, subjective measures and Hawthorne effects. Few studies reported on every outcome category. Most reported improved staff attitudes, and six of eight reported significantly better teamwork after training. Five of eight studies reported improved technical performance, improved efficiency or reduced errors. Three studies reported evidence of clinical benefit, but this was modest or of borderline significance in each case. Studies with a stronger intervention were more likely to report benefits than those providing less training. None of the randomized trials found evidence of technical or clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: The evidence for technical or clinical benefit from teamwork training in medicine is weak. There is some evidence of benefit from studies with more intensive training programmes, but better quality research and cost-benefit analysis are needed.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:21:22Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f2d2152c-e355-4223-8b62-98f88ee45f8c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:21:22Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f2d2152c-e355-4223-8b62-98f88ee45f8c2022-03-27T12:07:01ZInterventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f2d2152c-e355-4223-8b62-98f88ee45f8cEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011McCulloch, PRathbone, JCatchpole, K BACKGROUND: Concern over the frequency of unintended harm to patients has focused attention on the importance of teamwork and communication in avoiding errors. This has led to experiments with teamwork training programmes for clinical staff, mostly based on aviation models. These are widely assumed to be effective in improving patient safety, but the extent to which this assumption is justified by evidence remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review on the effects of teamwork training for clinical staff was performed. Information was sought on outcomes including staff attitudes, teamwork skills, technical performance, efficiency and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1036 relevant abstracts identified, 14 articles were analysed in detail: four randomized trials and ten non-randomized studies. Overall study quality was poor, with particular problems over blinding, subjective measures and Hawthorne effects. Few studies reported on every outcome category. Most reported improved staff attitudes, and six of eight reported significantly better teamwork after training. Five of eight studies reported improved technical performance, improved efficiency or reduced errors. Three studies reported evidence of clinical benefit, but this was modest or of borderline significance in each case. Studies with a stronger intervention were more likely to report benefits than those providing less training. None of the randomized trials found evidence of technical or clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: The evidence for technical or clinical benefit from teamwork training in medicine is weak. There is some evidence of benefit from studies with more intensive training programmes, but better quality research and cost-benefit analysis are needed.
spellingShingle McCulloch, P
Rathbone, J
Catchpole, K
Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
title Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
title_full Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
title_fullStr Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
title_short Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff.
title_sort interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff
work_keys_str_mv AT mccullochp interventionstoimproveteamworkandcommunicationsamonghealthcarestaff
AT rathbonej interventionstoimproveteamworkandcommunicationsamonghealthcarestaff
AT catchpolek interventionstoimproveteamworkandcommunicationsamonghealthcarestaff