Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production

Decarbonising ammonia production is an environmental imperative given that it independently accounts for 1.8% of global carbon dioxide emissions and supports the feeding of over 48% of the global population. The recent decline of production costs and its potential as an energy vector warrant investi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nayak-Luke, RM, Banares-Alcantara, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
_version_ 1797103685309825024
author Nayak-Luke, RM
Banares-Alcantara, R
author_facet Nayak-Luke, RM
Banares-Alcantara, R
author_sort Nayak-Luke, RM
collection OXFORD
description Decarbonising ammonia production is an environmental imperative given that it independently accounts for 1.8% of global carbon dioxide emissions and supports the feeding of over 48% of the global population. The recent decline of production costs and its potential as an energy vector warrant investigation of whether green ammonia production is commercially competitive. Considering 534 locations in 70 countries and designing and operating the islanded production process to minimise the levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA) at each, we show the range of achievable LCOA, the cost of process flexibility, the components of LCOA, and therein the scope of LCOA reduction achievable at present and in 2030. These results are benchmarked against ammonia spot prices, cost per GJ of refined fuels and the LCOE of alternative energy storage methods. Currently a LCOA of <span>&#36;</span>473 t−1 is achievable, at the best locations the required process flexibility increases the achievable LCOA by 56%; the electrolyser CAPEX and operation are the most significant costs. By 2030, <span>&#36;</span>310 t−1 is predicted to be achievable with multiple locations below $350 t−1. At <span>&#36;</span>25.4 GJ−1 currently and <span>&#36;</span>16.6 GJ−1 by 2030 prior combustion, this compares favourably against other refined fuels such as kerosene (<span>&#36;</span>8.7–18.3 GJ−1) that do not have the benefit of being carbon-free.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:23:37Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f381ab60-92a9-49a9-8b75-c2d0a2cb41d3
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:23:37Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f381ab60-92a9-49a9-8b75-c2d0a2cb41d32022-03-27T12:12:44ZTechno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional productionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f381ab60-92a9-49a9-8b75-c2d0a2cb41d3EnglishSymplectic ElementsRoyal Society of Chemistry2020Nayak-Luke, RMBanares-Alcantara, RDecarbonising ammonia production is an environmental imperative given that it independently accounts for 1.8% of global carbon dioxide emissions and supports the feeding of over 48% of the global population. The recent decline of production costs and its potential as an energy vector warrant investigation of whether green ammonia production is commercially competitive. Considering 534 locations in 70 countries and designing and operating the islanded production process to minimise the levelised cost of ammonia (LCOA) at each, we show the range of achievable LCOA, the cost of process flexibility, the components of LCOA, and therein the scope of LCOA reduction achievable at present and in 2030. These results are benchmarked against ammonia spot prices, cost per GJ of refined fuels and the LCOE of alternative energy storage methods. Currently a LCOA of <span>&#36;</span>473 t−1 is achievable, at the best locations the required process flexibility increases the achievable LCOA by 56%; the electrolyser CAPEX and operation are the most significant costs. By 2030, <span>&#36;</span>310 t−1 is predicted to be achievable with multiple locations below $350 t−1. At <span>&#36;</span>25.4 GJ−1 currently and <span>&#36;</span>16.6 GJ−1 by 2030 prior combustion, this compares favourably against other refined fuels such as kerosene (<span>&#36;</span>8.7–18.3 GJ−1) that do not have the benefit of being carbon-free.
spellingShingle Nayak-Luke, RM
Banares-Alcantara, R
Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
title Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
title_full Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
title_fullStr Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
title_full_unstemmed Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
title_short Techno-economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
title_sort techno economic viability of islanded green ammonia as a carbon free energy vector and as a substitute for conventional production
work_keys_str_mv AT nayaklukerm technoeconomicviabilityofislandedgreenammoniaasacarbonfreeenergyvectorandasasubstituteforconventionalproduction
AT banaresalcantarar technoeconomicviabilityofislandedgreenammoniaasacarbonfreeenergyvectorandasasubstituteforconventionalproduction