The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased.

The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Senn, S
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2000

Similar Items

Publication bias in systematic reviews.
by: Barbui, C, et al.
Published: (2007)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
by: Dwan, K, et al.
Published: (2008)

Attention bias in individuals with addictive disorders : systematic review protocol
by: Zhang, Melvyn, et al.
Published: (2019)

Cognitive biases in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant disorders : a systematic review
by: Zhang, Melvyn Weibin, et al.
Published: (2018)

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

The quality of systematic reviews. High quality reporting of both randomised trials and systematic reviews should be priority.
by: Altman, D, et al.
Published: (2000)

Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.
by: Boone, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Systematic review of data quality research
by: Jaya, M. Izham, et al.
Published: (2019)

Improving the quality and reporting of systematic reviews.
by: Eccleston, C, et al.
Published: (2010)

Systematic review: Bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity
by: Boone, D, et al.
Published: (2011)

Quality and Quality Standards In Construction: A Systematic Review
by: Nurhidayah, Azmy, et al.
Published: (2021)

A systematic review of attention biases in opioid, cannabis, stimulant use disorders
by: Fung, Daniel S. S., et al.
Published: (2018)

Artificial intelligence for mechanical ventilation: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and bias
by: Gallifant, J, et al.
Published: (2021)

Systematic review of ontology application in data quality
by: Mohd Jaya, Mohd Izham, et al.
Published: (2015)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
by: Pussegoda, K, et al.
Published: (2017)

The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors
by: Hodkinson, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

Web-based cognitive bias intervention for psychiatric disorders: protocol for a systematic review
by: Zhang, Melvyn, et al.
Published: (2018)

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2018)

Sleep-related attentional and interpretive-bias in insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Akram, U, et al.
Published: (2022)

A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies
by: Whiting, P, et al.
Published: (2013)

MHD turbulence: a biased review
by: Schekochihin, AA
Published: (2022)

A systematic review on radiology services quality indicators
by: Almalki, Abdullah A., et al.
Published: (2017)

Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
by: Griffiths, R, et al.
Published: (2018)

A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal length for predicting preterm birth.
by: Smith, V, et al.
Published: (2007)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Turner, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2022)

A biased review of biases in Twitter studies on political collective action
by: Cihon, P, et al.
Published: (2016)

Quality Factors of Test Cases: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Barraood, Samera Obaid, et al.
Published: (2018)

Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review
by: Othman, Noordin, et al.
Published: (2009)

Systematic review of the methodological and reporting quality of case series in surgery
by: Agha, R, et al.
Published: (2016)

Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
by: Saraswati, K, et al.
Published: (2019)

The impact of psoriatic arthritis on quality of life: a systematic review
by: James, L, et al.
Published: (2024)

Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Saini, P, et al.
Published: (2014)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2021)

Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions.
by: Smith, V, et al.
Published: (2011)

Studying systematic reviews.
by: Del Mar, C, et al.
Published: (2001)

Introduction to systematic reviews.
by: Goodwin, G, et al.
Published: (2004)

Topics, publication patterns, and reporting quality in systematic reviews in language education. Lessons from the International Database of Education Systematic Reviews (IDESR)
by: Chalmers, H, et al.
Published: (2023)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013)