Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts

In many different contexts, decision making is improved by the availability of probabilistic predictions. The accuracy of probabilistic forecasting methods can be compared using scoring functions, and insight provided by calibration tests. These tests evaluate the consistency of predictions with the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020
_version_ 1797107894592733184
author Taylor, J
author_facet Taylor, J
author_sort Taylor, J
collection OXFORD
description In many different contexts, decision making is improved by the availability of probabilistic predictions. The accuracy of probabilistic forecasting methods can be compared using scoring functions, and insight provided by calibration tests. These tests evaluate the consistency of predictions with the observations. Our main agenda in this paper is interval forecasts and their evaluation. Such forecasts are usually bounded by two quantile forecasts. However, a limitation of quantiles is that they convey no information regarding the size of potential exceedances. By contrast, the location of an expectile is dictated by the whole distribution. This prompts us to propose expectile-bounded intervals. We provide interpretation, a consistent scoring function and a calibration test. Before doing this, we reflect on the evaluation of forecasts of quantile bounded intervals and expectiles, and suggest extensions of previously proposed calibration tests in order to guard against strategic forecasting. We illustrate ideas using day-ahead electricity price forecasting.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:22:04Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f390813b-ae3a-4683-8027-3a80508c92af
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:22:04Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f390813b-ae3a-4683-8027-3a80508c92af2022-10-14T09:35:32ZEvaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecastsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f390813b-ae3a-4683-8027-3a80508c92afEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2020Taylor, JIn many different contexts, decision making is improved by the availability of probabilistic predictions. The accuracy of probabilistic forecasting methods can be compared using scoring functions, and insight provided by calibration tests. These tests evaluate the consistency of predictions with the observations. Our main agenda in this paper is interval forecasts and their evaluation. Such forecasts are usually bounded by two quantile forecasts. However, a limitation of quantiles is that they convey no information regarding the size of potential exceedances. By contrast, the location of an expectile is dictated by the whole distribution. This prompts us to propose expectile-bounded intervals. We provide interpretation, a consistent scoring function and a calibration test. Before doing this, we reflect on the evaluation of forecasts of quantile bounded intervals and expectiles, and suggest extensions of previously proposed calibration tests in order to guard against strategic forecasting. We illustrate ideas using day-ahead electricity price forecasting.
spellingShingle Taylor, J
Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts
title Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts
title_full Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts
title_fullStr Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts
title_short Evaluating quantile-bounded and expectile-bounded interval forecasts
title_sort evaluating quantile bounded and expectile bounded interval forecasts
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorj evaluatingquantileboundedandexpectileboundedintervalforecasts