Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI
A growing number of artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems are showing promising performance in preclinical, in silico, evaluation, but few have yet demonstrated real benefit to patient care. Early stage clinical evaluation is important to assess an AI system’s actual c...
Main Authors: | Vasey, B, Nagendran, M, Campbell, B, Clifton, DA, Collins, GS, Denaxas, S, Denniston, AK, Faes, L, Geerts, B, Ibrahim, M, Liu, X, Mateen, BA, Mathur, P, McCradden, MD, Morgan, L, Ordish, J, Rogers, C, Saria, S, Ting, DSW, Watkinson, P, Weber, W, Wheatstone, P, McCulloch, P |
---|---|
Other Authors: | DECIDE-AI expert group |
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Similar Items
-
DECIDE-AI: new reporting guidelines to bridge the development-to-implementation gap in clinical artificial intelligence
by: Vasey, B, et al.
Published: (2021) -
When is accuracy off-target?
by: Melissa D. McCradden
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Association of clinician diagnostic performance with machine learning-based decision support systems: a systematic review
by: Vasey, B, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Explaining decisions without explainability? Artificial intelligence and medicolegal accountability
by: Melissa D. McCradden, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
by: Melissa D McCradden, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)