Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI
A growing number of artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems are showing promising performance in preclinical, in silico, evaluation, but few have yet demonstrated real benefit to patient care. Early stage clinical evaluation is important to assess an AI system’s actual c...
Autori principali: | Vasey, B, Nagendran, M, Campbell, B, Clifton, DA, Collins, GS, Denaxas, S, Denniston, AK, Faes, L, Geerts, B, Ibrahim, M, Liu, X, Mateen, BA, Mathur, P, McCradden, MD, Morgan, L, Ordish, J, Rogers, C, Saria, S, Ting, DSW, Watkinson, P, Weber, W, Wheatstone, P, McCulloch, P |
---|---|
Altri autori: | DECIDE-AI expert group |
Natura: | Journal article |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Documenti analoghi
-
DECIDE-AI: new reporting guidelines to bridge the development-to-implementation gap in clinical artificial intelligence
di: Vasey, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021) -
When is accuracy off-target?
di: Melissa D. McCradden
Pubblicazione: (2021-06-01) -
Association of clinician diagnostic performance with machine learning-based decision support systems: a systematic review
di: Vasey, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021) -
Concussions in Sledding Sports and the Unrecognized “Sled Head”: A Systematic Review
di: Melissa D. McCradden, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018-09-01) -
Explaining decisions without explainability? Artificial intelligence and medicolegal accountability
di: Melissa D. McCradden, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024-09-01)