The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.

From 1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath-1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In both the relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP)...

Deskribapen osoa

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile Nagusiak: Coles, A, Cox, A, Le Page, E, Jones, J, Trip, SA, Deans, J, Seaman, S, Miller, D, Hale, G, Waldmann, H, Compston, D
Formatua: Journal article
Hizkuntza:English
Argitaratua: 2006
_version_ 1826304924525264896
author Coles, A
Cox, A
Le Page, E
Jones, J
Trip, SA
Deans, J
Seaman, S
Miller, D
Hale, G
Waldmann, H
Compston, D
author_facet Coles, A
Cox, A
Le Page, E
Jones, J
Trip, SA
Deans, J
Seaman, S
Miller, D
Hale, G
Waldmann, H
Compston, D
author_sort Coles, A
collection OXFORD
description From 1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath-1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In both the relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) stages of the illness, Campath-1H reduced the annual relapse rate (from 2.2 to 0.19 and from 0.7 to 0.001 respectively; both p < 0.001). Remarkably, MRI scans of patients with SP disease, treated with Campath-1H 7 years previously, showed no new lesion formation. However, despite these effects on inflammation, disability was differently affected depending on the phase of the disease. Patients with SPMS showed sustained accumulation of disability due to uncontrolled progression marked by unrelenting cerebral atrophy, attributable to ongoing axonal loss. The rate of cerebral atrophy was greatest in patients with established cerebral atrophy and highest inflammatory lesion burden before treatment (2.3 versus 0.7 ml/year; p = 0.04). In contrast, patients with RR disease showed an impressive reduction in disability at 6 months after Campath-1H (by a mean of 1.2 EDSS points) perhaps owing to a suppression of on-going inflammation in these patients with unusually active disease. In addition, there was a further significant, albeit smaller, mean improvement in disability up to 36 months after treatment. We speculate that this represents the beneficial effects of early rescue of neurons and axons from a toxic inflammatory environment, and that prevention of demyelination will prevent long-term axonal degeneration. These concepts are currently being tested in a controlled trial comparing Campath-1H and IFN-beta in the treatment of drug-naïve patients with early, active RR MS.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:25:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f402663b-df64-4a4a-a910-b18ef48c9b72
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:25:05Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f402663b-df64-4a4a-a910-b18ef48c9b722022-03-27T12:16:32ZThe window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f402663b-df64-4a4a-a910-b18ef48c9b72EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Coles, ACox, ALe Page, EJones, JTrip, SADeans, JSeaman, SMiller, DHale, GWaldmann, HCompston, DFrom 1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath-1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In both the relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) stages of the illness, Campath-1H reduced the annual relapse rate (from 2.2 to 0.19 and from 0.7 to 0.001 respectively; both p < 0.001). Remarkably, MRI scans of patients with SP disease, treated with Campath-1H 7 years previously, showed no new lesion formation. However, despite these effects on inflammation, disability was differently affected depending on the phase of the disease. Patients with SPMS showed sustained accumulation of disability due to uncontrolled progression marked by unrelenting cerebral atrophy, attributable to ongoing axonal loss. The rate of cerebral atrophy was greatest in patients with established cerebral atrophy and highest inflammatory lesion burden before treatment (2.3 versus 0.7 ml/year; p = 0.04). In contrast, patients with RR disease showed an impressive reduction in disability at 6 months after Campath-1H (by a mean of 1.2 EDSS points) perhaps owing to a suppression of on-going inflammation in these patients with unusually active disease. In addition, there was a further significant, albeit smaller, mean improvement in disability up to 36 months after treatment. We speculate that this represents the beneficial effects of early rescue of neurons and axons from a toxic inflammatory environment, and that prevention of demyelination will prevent long-term axonal degeneration. These concepts are currently being tested in a controlled trial comparing Campath-1H and IFN-beta in the treatment of drug-naïve patients with early, active RR MS.
spellingShingle Coles, A
Cox, A
Le Page, E
Jones, J
Trip, SA
Deans, J
Seaman, S
Miller, D
Hale, G
Waldmann, H
Compston, D
The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.
title The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.
title_full The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.
title_fullStr The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.
title_full_unstemmed The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.
title_short The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.
title_sort window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy
work_keys_str_mv AT colesa thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT coxa thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT lepagee thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT jonesj thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT tripsa thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT deansj thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT seamans thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT millerd thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT haleg thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT waldmannh thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT compstond thewindowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT colesa windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT coxa windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT lepagee windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT jonesj windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT tripsa windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT deansj windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT seamans windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT millerd windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT haleg windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT waldmannh windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy
AT compstond windowoftherapeuticopportunityinmultiplesclerosisevidencefrommonoclonalantibodytherapy