The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C.
<p>This thesis examines the Athenian ephebeia, from its creation to 200 B.C. The primary aim of the study is to examine the forces which led to the perception of a need for the ephebeia and which influenced its creation.</p><p>After describing the institution and then investigating...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1994
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1826304944210182144 |
|---|---|
| author | de Marcellus, H |
| author2 | Forrest, W |
| author_facet | Forrest, W de Marcellus, H |
| author_sort | de Marcellus, H |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>This thesis examines the Athenian ephebeia, from its creation to 200 B.C. The primary aim of the study is to examine the forces which led to the perception of a need for the ephebeia and which influenced its creation.</p><p>After describing the institution and then investigating the available evidence for its foundation date, I argue that the "formal ephebeia" was created in 335 B.C. and was substantially different in form from anything which had preceded it. There were, however, some antecedent aspects of the ephebeia which can be traced to earlier times.</p><p>The following two chapters examine forces in the fifth and early fourth century which contributed to the creation of the ephebeia. The first is an examination of Greek military innovation in the fourth century and of new Athenian defensive policy. The second investigates a "discourse" of educational thought which was present in the intellectual circles of Athens in the fourth century, the nature of which can be found in writings of the "Socratic" philosophers. In the fifth chapter I descrive the environment of "Lycurgan Athens" and argue that the ephebeia was a deliberately "invented tradition" which suited its ideological context. The final chapter examines all available evidence for the history of the organization from 322 to 200 B.C., charting a transformation of the institution. There are two appendices: one on the demography of late fourth century Athens and its relationship to the ephebeia, the other on the life-dates of Menander and the year of his ephebate. There are also two catalogues of inscriptions. The first provides all fourth century ephebic inscriptions since the publication of Reinmuth's collection (or changes to those). The second provides all published third century ephebic inscriptions and some from the early second century.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:25:24Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oxford-uuid:f41d34a4-d3e9-4113-8694-1a58d92f4108 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:25:24Z |
| publishDate | 1994 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:f41d34a4-d3e9-4113-8694-1a58d92f41082022-03-27T12:17:15ZThe origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C.Thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:f41d34a4-d3e9-4113-8694-1a58d92f4108HistoryHistory of the ancient worldEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet1994de Marcellus, HForrest, WLane Fox, R<p>This thesis examines the Athenian ephebeia, from its creation to 200 B.C. The primary aim of the study is to examine the forces which led to the perception of a need for the ephebeia and which influenced its creation.</p><p>After describing the institution and then investigating the available evidence for its foundation date, I argue that the "formal ephebeia" was created in 335 B.C. and was substantially different in form from anything which had preceded it. There were, however, some antecedent aspects of the ephebeia which can be traced to earlier times.</p><p>The following two chapters examine forces in the fifth and early fourth century which contributed to the creation of the ephebeia. The first is an examination of Greek military innovation in the fourth century and of new Athenian defensive policy. The second investigates a "discourse" of educational thought which was present in the intellectual circles of Athens in the fourth century, the nature of which can be found in writings of the "Socratic" philosophers. In the fifth chapter I descrive the environment of "Lycurgan Athens" and argue that the ephebeia was a deliberately "invented tradition" which suited its ideological context. The final chapter examines all available evidence for the history of the organization from 322 to 200 B.C., charting a transformation of the institution. There are two appendices: one on the demography of late fourth century Athens and its relationship to the ephebeia, the other on the life-dates of Menander and the year of his ephebate. There are also two catalogues of inscriptions. The first provides all fourth century ephebic inscriptions since the publication of Reinmuth's collection (or changes to those). The second provides all published third century ephebic inscriptions and some from the early second century.</p> |
| spellingShingle | History History of the ancient world de Marcellus, H The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C. |
| title | The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C. |
| title_full | The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C. |
| title_fullStr | The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C. |
| title_short | The origins and nature of the Attic ephebeia to 200 B.C. |
| title_sort | origins and nature of the attic ephebeia to 200 b c |
| topic | History History of the ancient world |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT demarcellush theoriginsandnatureoftheatticephebeiato200bc AT demarcellush originsandnatureoftheatticephebeiato200bc |