More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds

Social Impact Bonds are considered a highly marketised form of public service delivery and are understood to “work” through the introduction of new capital into payment-by-results contracts. This paper, for the first time, connects findings from UK SIBs to the evaluation of conventional payment-by-r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carter, E
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2019
_version_ 1797103889191796736
author Carter, E
author_facet Carter, E
author_sort Carter, E
collection OXFORD
description Social Impact Bonds are considered a highly marketised form of public service delivery and are understood to “work” through the introduction of new capital into payment-by-results contracts. This paper, for the first time, connects findings from UK SIBs to the evaluation of conventional payment-by-results contracts and the theoretical literature on governance and accountabilities. Markets and capital emerge as a potential red herring with hybridity of governance and the “social” positioned as important dimensions facilitating qualitatively different services. This raises questions as to whether it is possible to extend SIBs, or whether increased scale and mainstream investors will dilute the “SIB effect”.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:26:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f47345af-4b3b-499a-9d25-1dc84ee4be59
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:26:25Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f47345af-4b3b-499a-9d25-1dc84ee4be592022-03-27T12:19:55ZMore than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact BondsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f47345af-4b3b-499a-9d25-1dc84ee4be59EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2019Carter, ESocial Impact Bonds are considered a highly marketised form of public service delivery and are understood to “work” through the introduction of new capital into payment-by-results contracts. This paper, for the first time, connects findings from UK SIBs to the evaluation of conventional payment-by-results contracts and the theoretical literature on governance and accountabilities. Markets and capital emerge as a potential red herring with hybridity of governance and the “social” positioned as important dimensions facilitating qualitatively different services. This raises questions as to whether it is possible to extend SIBs, or whether increased scale and mainstream investors will dilute the “SIB effect”.
spellingShingle Carter, E
More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds
title More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds
title_full More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds
title_fullStr More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds
title_full_unstemmed More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds
title_short More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds
title_sort more than marketised exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in social impact bonds
work_keys_str_mv AT cartere morethanmarketisedexploringthegovernanceandaccountabilitymechanismsatplayinsocialimpactbonds