Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris?

Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris?

<h4>Aims</h4> <p>To determine the outcomes following revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), and to identify factors predictive of re-revision.</p> <h4>Patients and Methods</h4> <p&g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Matharu, GS, Judge, A, Pandit, HG, Murray, DW
Format:	Journal article
Published:	British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2017

Similar Items

Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris: A clinical update
by: Gulraj S Matharu, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Has the threshold for revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris changed in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? A cohort study using an adapted risk stratification algorithm
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients: analysis of 185 revisions from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

No threshold exists for recommending revision surgery in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients with adverse reactions to metal debris: a retrospective cohort study of 346 revisions
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Blood metal ion thresholds to identify patients with metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris: An external multicenter validation study of Birmingham hip resurfacing and corail-pinnacle implants
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

The effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying patients with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris: An external multi-centre validation study
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip revision surgery depend on the reason for failure: a propensity score matched study
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?: A clinical update
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Adverse reaction to metal debris with accompanying gout and amyloid deposits in hip arthroplasty
by: Love Shah, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Adverse reaction to metal debris with concomitant incidental crystalline arthropathy in hip arthroplasty
by: Edward J. Testa, BS, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?: A clinical update
by: Gulraj S Matharu, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components and the risk of re-revision following revision total hip arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Trabecular Metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components and the risk of re-revision following revision total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

The effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying patients with unilateral Birmingham hip resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris.
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

The cobalt-to-chromium ratio "may be" a key marker for adverse local tissue reactions in metal-on-metal hips
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2015)

Follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients is currently not evidence based or cost effective
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2015)

The investigation and management of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients
by: Matharu, G
Published: (2017)

Which imaging modality is most effective for identifying pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacings requiring revision: ultrasound or MARS-MRI or both?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Risk factors affecting the onset of adverse reaction to metal debris after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with a focus on serum metal ion concentrations
by: Makoto Kato, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions.
by: Mabilleau, G, et al.
Published: (2008)

Poor survivorship and frequent complications at a median of 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Implant failure in bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties: A clinical and pathological study
by: Uchihara, Y, et al.
Published: (2018)

Adverse reaction to metal debris in a patient with acetabular shell loosening 8 years after ceramic-on-metal total hip arthroplasty
by: Benjamin R. Pulley, MD, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Trabecular metal acetabular components reduce the risk of revision following primary total hip arthroplasty: A propensity score matched study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Adverse Reactions and Patient Management
by: James Drummond, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Can blood metal ion levels be used to identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacings who are at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2015)

Metal-on-metal hips: current status
by: Ansari, J, et al.
Published: (2017)

Patient and radiographic factors help to predict metal-on-metal hip resurfacings with evidence of a pseudotumor
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties.
by: Mahendra, G, et al.
Published: (2009)

Follow-up guidance for metal-on-metal hip replacement patients should be updated
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2015)

Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty adverse local tissue reaction with intermittent unilateral vascular claudication
by: Alex Lencioni, MD, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)