Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection

<p><strong>Objectives:</strong>&nbsp;To identify patterns in inflammatory marker and vital sign responses in adult with suspected bloodstream infection (BSI) and define expected trends in normal recovery.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong>&nbsp;We incl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gu, Q, Wei, J, Yoon, CH, Yuan, K, Jones, N, Brent, A, Llewelyn, M, Peto, TEA, Pouwels, KB, Eyre, DW, Walker, AS
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024
_version_ 1811140081832951808
author Gu, Q
Wei, J
Yoon, CH
Yuan, K
Jones, N
Brent, A
Llewelyn, M
Peto, TEA
Pouwels, KB
Eyre, DW
Walker, AS
author_facet Gu, Q
Wei, J
Yoon, CH
Yuan, K
Jones, N
Brent, A
Llewelyn, M
Peto, TEA
Pouwels, KB
Eyre, DW
Walker, AS
author_sort Gu, Q
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objectives:</strong>&nbsp;To identify patterns in inflammatory marker and vital sign responses in adult with suspected bloodstream infection (BSI) and define expected trends in normal recovery.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong>&nbsp;We included patients &ge;16&nbsp;y from Oxford University Hospitals with a blood culture taken between 1-January-2016 and 28-June-2021. We used linear and latent class mixed models to estimate trajectories in C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count, heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature and identify CRP response subgroups. Centile charts for expected CRP responses were constructed via the lambda-mu-sigma method.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;In 88,348 suspected BSI episodes; 6908 (7.8%) were culture-positive with a probable pathogen, 4309 (4.9%) contained potential contaminants, and 77,131(87.3%) were culture-negative. CRP levels generally peaked 1&ndash;2&nbsp;days after blood culture collection, with varying responses for different pathogens and infection sources (p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.0001). We identified five CRP trajectory subgroups: peak on day 1 (36,091; 46.3%) or 2 (4529; 5.8%), slow recovery (10,666; 13.7%), peak on day 6 (743; 1.0%), and low response (25,928; 33.3%). Centile reference charts tracking normal responses were constructed from those peaking on day 1/2.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>&nbsp;CRP and other infection response markers rise and recover differently depending on clinical syndrome and pathogen involved. However, centile reference charts, that account for these differences, can be used to track if patients are recovering as expected and to help personalise infection treatment.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-09T03:59:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f5788204-63df-4662-84bf-f5a19840b99e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:16:19Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f5788204-63df-4662-84bf-f5a19840b99e2024-07-20T14:04:33ZDistinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infectionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f5788204-63df-4662-84bf-f5a19840b99eEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2024Gu, QWei, JYoon, CHYuan, KJones, NBrent, ALlewelyn, MPeto, TEAPouwels, KBEyre, DWWalker, AS<p><strong>Objectives:</strong>&nbsp;To identify patterns in inflammatory marker and vital sign responses in adult with suspected bloodstream infection (BSI) and define expected trends in normal recovery.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong>&nbsp;We included patients &ge;16&nbsp;y from Oxford University Hospitals with a blood culture taken between 1-January-2016 and 28-June-2021. We used linear and latent class mixed models to estimate trajectories in C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count, heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature and identify CRP response subgroups. Centile charts for expected CRP responses were constructed via the lambda-mu-sigma method.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;In 88,348 suspected BSI episodes; 6908 (7.8%) were culture-positive with a probable pathogen, 4309 (4.9%) contained potential contaminants, and 77,131(87.3%) were culture-negative. CRP levels generally peaked 1&ndash;2&nbsp;days after blood culture collection, with varying responses for different pathogens and infection sources (p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.0001). We identified five CRP trajectory subgroups: peak on day 1 (36,091; 46.3%) or 2 (4529; 5.8%), slow recovery (10,666; 13.7%), peak on day 6 (743; 1.0%), and low response (25,928; 33.3%). Centile reference charts tracking normal responses were constructed from those peaking on day 1/2.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>&nbsp;CRP and other infection response markers rise and recover differently depending on clinical syndrome and pathogen involved. However, centile reference charts, that account for these differences, can be used to track if patients are recovering as expected and to help personalise infection treatment.</p>
spellingShingle Gu, Q
Wei, J
Yoon, CH
Yuan, K
Jones, N
Brent, A
Llewelyn, M
Peto, TEA
Pouwels, KB
Eyre, DW
Walker, AS
Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
title Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
title_full Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
title_fullStr Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
title_full_unstemmed Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
title_short Distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
title_sort distinct patterns of vital sign and inflammatory marker responses in adults with suspected bloodstream infection
work_keys_str_mv AT guq distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT weij distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT yoonch distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT yuank distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT jonesn distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT brenta distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT llewelynm distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT petotea distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT pouwelskb distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT eyredw distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection
AT walkeras distinctpatternsofvitalsignandinflammatorymarkerresponsesinadultswithsuspectedbloodstreaminfection