Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea

Bushmeat consumption is affected by household wealth. However, how household wealth impacts bushmeat eaten in different environmental and social settings (i.e. whether urban, rural, coastal or forest) is poorly understood. In this study, we sampled households in six contrasting localities in Rio Mun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fa, J, Albrechtsen, L, Johnson, P, Macdonald, D
Format: Journal article
Published: 2009
_version_ 1797104147672072192
author Fa, J
Albrechtsen, L
Johnson, P
Macdonald, D
author_facet Fa, J
Albrechtsen, L
Johnson, P
Macdonald, D
author_sort Fa, J
collection OXFORD
description Bushmeat consumption is affected by household wealth. However, how household wealth impacts bushmeat eaten in different environmental and social settings (i.e. whether urban, rural, coastal or forest) is poorly understood. In this study, we sampled households in six contrasting localities in Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea, in coastal (Bata, Cogo), central (Niefang, Evinayong) and eastern parts of the territory (Ebebiyin, Nsork). On average, 32.3 g of bushmeat per adult male equivalent per day were consumed, though this varied widely between sites and most households ate no bushmeat on the survey day. Fish was the most frequently recorded source of protein and in a coastal site, Cogo, significantly more fish was consumed than in the other localities. Overall, average protein consumption was correlated with household wealth, but the strength of this effect varied among sites. At the site where average wealth was highest (Bata, the most urban site), bushmeat was more expensive, and wealthier households ate more of it. Elsewhere bushmeat consumption was not associated with wealth, and the cost of bushmeat was a higher proportion of household wealth. In Bata, wealthier households reported consumption of more than one meat type (most frequently bushmeat and either domestic meat or fish), and diversity of dietary items also increased with wealth. In all sites, wealthier households ate less fish. We demonstrate distinct differences in relationships between urban versus rural areas, and between coastal versus inland sites. We therefore caution that general patterns of wealth-wild meat consumption must be evaluated taking account the circumstances of wild meat consumers. © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 The Zoological Society of London.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:29:45Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f59671f1-ae4b-4461-aefe-d0842d6c1c0d
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:29:45Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f59671f1-ae4b-4461-aefe-d0842d6c1c0d2022-03-27T12:28:17ZLinkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial GuineaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f59671f1-ae4b-4461-aefe-d0842d6c1c0dSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Fa, JAlbrechtsen, LJohnson, PMacdonald, DBushmeat consumption is affected by household wealth. However, how household wealth impacts bushmeat eaten in different environmental and social settings (i.e. whether urban, rural, coastal or forest) is poorly understood. In this study, we sampled households in six contrasting localities in Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea, in coastal (Bata, Cogo), central (Niefang, Evinayong) and eastern parts of the territory (Ebebiyin, Nsork). On average, 32.3 g of bushmeat per adult male equivalent per day were consumed, though this varied widely between sites and most households ate no bushmeat on the survey day. Fish was the most frequently recorded source of protein and in a coastal site, Cogo, significantly more fish was consumed than in the other localities. Overall, average protein consumption was correlated with household wealth, but the strength of this effect varied among sites. At the site where average wealth was highest (Bata, the most urban site), bushmeat was more expensive, and wealthier households ate more of it. Elsewhere bushmeat consumption was not associated with wealth, and the cost of bushmeat was a higher proportion of household wealth. In Bata, wealthier households reported consumption of more than one meat type (most frequently bushmeat and either domestic meat or fish), and diversity of dietary items also increased with wealth. In all sites, wealthier households ate less fish. We demonstrate distinct differences in relationships between urban versus rural areas, and between coastal versus inland sites. We therefore caution that general patterns of wealth-wild meat consumption must be evaluated taking account the circumstances of wild meat consumers. © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 The Zoological Society of London.
spellingShingle Fa, J
Albrechtsen, L
Johnson, P
Macdonald, D
Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
title Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
title_full Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
title_fullStr Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
title_full_unstemmed Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
title_short Linkages between household wealth, bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant: evidence from Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
title_sort linkages between household wealth bushmeat and other animal protein consumption are not invariant evidence from rio muni equatorial guinea
work_keys_str_mv AT faj linkagesbetweenhouseholdwealthbushmeatandotheranimalproteinconsumptionarenotinvariantevidencefromriomuniequatorialguinea
AT albrechtsenl linkagesbetweenhouseholdwealthbushmeatandotheranimalproteinconsumptionarenotinvariantevidencefromriomuniequatorialguinea
AT johnsonp linkagesbetweenhouseholdwealthbushmeatandotheranimalproteinconsumptionarenotinvariantevidencefromriomuniequatorialguinea
AT macdonaldd linkagesbetweenhouseholdwealthbushmeatandotheranimalproteinconsumptionarenotinvariantevidencefromriomuniequatorialguinea