Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank

<p><strong>Background</strong><br> Uncertainty persists about carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and the independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for CIMT. We assessed the independent relevance of general adiposity...

Disgrifiad llawn

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Prif Awduron: Pillay, P, Carter, JL, Taylor, H, Lewington, S, Clarke, R
Fformat: Journal article
Iaith:English
Cyhoeddwyd: Wiley 2023
_version_ 1826309843294617600
author Pillay, P
Carter, JL
Taylor, H
Lewington, S
Clarke, R
author_facet Pillay, P
Carter, JL
Taylor, H
Lewington, S
Clarke, R
author_sort Pillay, P
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background</strong><br> Uncertainty persists about carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and the independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for CIMT. We assessed the independent relevance of general adiposity (body mass index), central adiposity (waist circumference), and body composition (fat mass index and fat‐free mass index) with CIMT among adults in the United Kingdom.<br><br> <strong>Methods and Results</strong><br> Multivariable linear regression of cross‐sectional analyses of UK Biobank assessed the mean percentage difference in CIMT associated with equivalent differences in adiposity measures. To assess independent associations, body mass index and waist circumference were mutually adjusted, as were fat mass index and fat‐free mass index. Among 39 367 participants (mean [SD] age 64 [8] years, 52% female, 97% White), median (interquartile range) CIMT was 0.65 (0.14) mm in women and 0.69 (0.18) mm in men. All adiposity measures were linearly and positively associated with CIMT after adjusting for confounders. Fat‐free mass index was most strongly associated with CIMT after adjustment for fat mass index (% difference in CIMT: 1.23 [95% CI 0.93–1.53] women; 3.44 [3.01–3.86] men), while associations of fat mass index were attenuated after adjustment for fat‐free mass index (0.28 [−0.02, 0.58] women; −0.59 [−0.99, −0.18] men). After mutual adjustment, body mass index remained positively associated with CIMT, but waist circumference was completely attenuated.<br><br> <strong>Conclusions</strong><br> Fat‐free mass index was the adiposity measure most strongly associated with CIMT, suggesting that CIMT may reflect vascular compensatory remodeling rather than atherosclerosis. Hence, screening for subclinical atherosclerosis should evaluate carotid plaques in addition to CIMT.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:41:44Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f6168a82-49b4-44f8-be2c-bc4b5d758ce4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:41:44Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f6168a82-49b4-44f8-be2c-bc4b5d758ce42023-04-19T16:38:15ZIndependent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK BiobankJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f6168a82-49b4-44f8-be2c-bc4b5d758ce4EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2023Pillay, PCarter, JLTaylor, HLewington, SClarke, R<p><strong>Background</strong><br> Uncertainty persists about carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and the independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for CIMT. We assessed the independent relevance of general adiposity (body mass index), central adiposity (waist circumference), and body composition (fat mass index and fat‐free mass index) with CIMT among adults in the United Kingdom.<br><br> <strong>Methods and Results</strong><br> Multivariable linear regression of cross‐sectional analyses of UK Biobank assessed the mean percentage difference in CIMT associated with equivalent differences in adiposity measures. To assess independent associations, body mass index and waist circumference were mutually adjusted, as were fat mass index and fat‐free mass index. Among 39 367 participants (mean [SD] age 64 [8] years, 52% female, 97% White), median (interquartile range) CIMT was 0.65 (0.14) mm in women and 0.69 (0.18) mm in men. All adiposity measures were linearly and positively associated with CIMT after adjusting for confounders. Fat‐free mass index was most strongly associated with CIMT after adjustment for fat mass index (% difference in CIMT: 1.23 [95% CI 0.93–1.53] women; 3.44 [3.01–3.86] men), while associations of fat mass index were attenuated after adjustment for fat‐free mass index (0.28 [−0.02, 0.58] women; −0.59 [−0.99, −0.18] men). After mutual adjustment, body mass index remained positively associated with CIMT, but waist circumference was completely attenuated.<br><br> <strong>Conclusions</strong><br> Fat‐free mass index was the adiposity measure most strongly associated with CIMT, suggesting that CIMT may reflect vascular compensatory remodeling rather than atherosclerosis. Hence, screening for subclinical atherosclerosis should evaluate carotid plaques in addition to CIMT.</p>
spellingShingle Pillay, P
Carter, JL
Taylor, H
Lewington, S
Clarke, R
Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank
title Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank
title_full Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank
title_fullStr Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank
title_full_unstemmed Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank
title_short Independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima‐media thickness in 40 000 adults in UK Biobank
title_sort independent relevance of different measures of adiposity for carotid intima media thickness in 40 000 adults in uk biobank
work_keys_str_mv AT pillayp independentrelevanceofdifferentmeasuresofadiposityforcarotidintimamediathicknessin40000adultsinukbiobank
AT carterjl independentrelevanceofdifferentmeasuresofadiposityforcarotidintimamediathicknessin40000adultsinukbiobank
AT taylorh independentrelevanceofdifferentmeasuresofadiposityforcarotidintimamediathicknessin40000adultsinukbiobank
AT lewingtons independentrelevanceofdifferentmeasuresofadiposityforcarotidintimamediathicknessin40000adultsinukbiobank
AT clarker independentrelevanceofdifferentmeasuresofadiposityforcarotidintimamediathicknessin40000adultsinukbiobank