Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries

Show other versions (1)

<p style="text-align:justify;">The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group have evaluated and recommended best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplast...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Rolfson, O, Bohm, E, Franklin, P, Lyman, S, Denissen, G, Dawson, J, Dunn, J, Chenok, K, Dunbar, M, Overgaard, S, Garellick, G, Lubbeke, A
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	Taylor and Francis 2016

Similar Items

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries
by: Rolfson, O, et al.
Published: (2016)

Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries: Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty RegistriesPart II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis
by: Ola Rolfson, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)

Geographical variations in patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty between 2008 - 2012
by: Linnea Oldsberg, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries
by: Ferguson, R, et al.
Published: (2019)

Comorbidity does not predict long-term mortality after total hip arthroplasty
by: Erik Bülow, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)

Patients' experience on pain outcomes after hip arthroplasty: insights from an information tool based on registry data
by: Fabiano, G, et al.
Published: (2024)

''Will I have to get my other hip replaced as well?'' Contralateral outcomes after hip arthroplasty from an information tool based on registry data
by: Pinedo-Villanueva, R, et al.
Published: (2022)

Patients’ experience on pain outcomes after hip arthroplasty: insights from an information tool based on registry data
by: Gianluca Fabiano, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Registry stakeholders
by: Lübbeke, A, et al.
Published: (2019)

Limping and patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study
by: Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

Systematic review of measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty
by: Harris, K, et al.
Published: (2016)

Have people like me experienced pain after their hip arthroplasty? Insights from DEdiCADE, an information tool based on registry data
by: Lübbeke Wolff, A, et al.
Published: (2022)

Outcome of patients with osteoarthritis aged 90 to 101 years after cemented total hip arthroplasty: 1,385 patients from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register
by: Mattias Schaufelberger, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Important patient characteristics differ prior to total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty between Switzerland and the United States.
by: Franklin, P, et al.
Published: (2017)

Leveraging registry data to improve patient-clinician communication about total hip arthroplasty: the case of 'patients like me' information tool
by: Pinedo-Villanueva, R, et al.
Published: (2023)

Implant survival and patient-reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger: a matched cohort study of 1,008 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
by: Maziar Mohaddes, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

International variation in shoulder arthroplasty
by: Lübbeke, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

No clinically relevant difference in patient-reported outcomes between the direct superior approach and the posterolateral or anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 37,976 primary hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry
by: Bart van Dooren, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Minor influence of patient education and physiotherapy interventions before total hip replacement on patient-reported outcomes: an observational study of 30,756 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
by: Christopher Torisho, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain, function, and quality of life postoperatively?: A cross-sectional study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry
by: Claus Varnum, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Intermediate Term Clinical Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: The CU Total Ankle Registry
by: Kenneth Hunt MD, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Re: Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results.
by: Dawson, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

Advantages and limitations of national arthroplasty registries. The need for multicenter registries: the Rempro-SBQ
by: Luiz Sérgio Marcelino Gomes, et al.

Does choice of bearings influence the survival of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 20–55 years? Comparison of 21,594 patients reported to the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association dataset 2005–2017
by: Rasmus Tyrsted Mikkelsen, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Function outcomes of 'patients like me' after hip replacement? Insights from DEdiCADE, an information tool based on registry data
by: Cole, S, et al.
Published: (2022)

External validation of the Tyrolean hip arthroplasty registry
by: Moritz Wagner, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
by: Claire Tilbury MD, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Patient-reported 1-year outcome not affected by body mass index in 3,327 total knee arthroplasty patients
by: Anders Overgaard, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Increasing risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association
by: Håvard Dale, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Concordance among Swedish, German, Danish, and UK EQ-5D-3L Value Sets: Analyses of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
by: Fitsum Sebsibe Teni, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

The association between socioeconomic status and the 90-day risk of cardiovascular events after total hip arthroplasty – registry-based study of 103,286 patients
by: Nina M Edwards, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Relation to Preoperative Patient-Reported and Radiographic Measures
by: Timothy L. Kahn BA, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

IMPORTANCE OF FOUNDATION OF THE NATIONAL TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY
by: Tomaž Silvester, et al.
Published: (2004-06-01)

Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe
by: Lübbeke, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective
by: Bryan D. Springer, MD, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Changes Over a Decade in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Reporting in Total Joint Arthroplasty
by: Boaz Goldberg, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

EPRO MIGRATION AND USABILITY TESTING OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) MEASURES
by: Wilkins, G, et al.
Published: (2013)

Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry
by: Arno A. Macken, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Does malalignment affect patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
by: Hadi, M, et al.
Published: (2016)

Design, Implementation, and Applicability Evaluation of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registry
by: Sajad Samadi Avansar, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)