No provocation without responsibility: a reply to Mackay and Mitchell

Responds to the argument for unifying the defences of provocation and diminished responsibility as put forward by R.D. Mackay and B.J. Mitchell in Crim. L.R. 2003, 745-759. Refers to the authors' earlier critique of the House of Lords judgment in R. v Smith (Morgan James) in Crim. L.R. 2001, 62...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gardner, J, Macklem, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Sweet and Maxwell 2004

Similar Items