No provocation without responsibility: a reply to Mackay and Mitchell
Responds to the argument for unifying the defences of provocation and diminished responsibility as put forward by R.D. Mackay and B.J. Mitchell in Crim. L.R. 2003, 745-759. Refers to the authors' earlier critique of the House of Lords judgment in R. v Smith (Morgan James) in Crim. L.R. 2001, 62...
| Huvudupphovsmän: | , |
|---|---|
| Materialtyp: | Journal article |
| Språk: | English |
| Publicerad: |
Sweet and Maxwell
2004
|