Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor
The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is an established surgical target for stereotactic ablation and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). It is centrally placed on a cerebello-thalamo-cortical network co...
| मुख्य लेखकों: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| स्वरूप: | Journal article |
| भाषा: | English |
| प्रकाशित: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| _version_ | 1826305359155822592 |
|---|---|
| author | Akram, H Dayal, V Mahlknecht, P Georgiev, D Hyam, J Foltynie, T Limousin, P De Vita, E Jahanshahi, M Ashburner, J Behrens, T Hariz, M Zrinzo, L |
| author_facet | Akram, H Dayal, V Mahlknecht, P Georgiev, D Hyam, J Foltynie, T Limousin, P De Vita, E Jahanshahi, M Ashburner, J Behrens, T Hariz, M Zrinzo, L |
| author_sort | Akram, H |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is an established surgical target for stereotactic ablation and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). It is centrally placed on a cerebello-thalamo-cortical network connecting the primary motor cortex, to the dentate nucleus of the contralateral cerebellum through the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT). The VIM is not readily visible on conventional MR imaging, so identifying the surgical target traditionally involved indirect targeting that relies on atlas-defined coordinates. Unfortunately, this approach does not fully account for individual variability and requires surgery to be performed with the patient awake to allow for intraoperative targeting confirmation. The aim of this study is to identify the VIM and the DRT using probabilistic tractography in patients that will undergo thalamic DBS for tremor. Four male patients with tremor dominant PD and five patients (three female) with ET underwent high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) (128 diffusion directions, 1.5 mm isotropic voxels and b value = 1500) preoperatively. Patients received VIM-DBS using an MR image guided and MR image verified approach with indirect targeting. Postoperatively, using parallel Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) processing, thalamic areas with the highest diffusion connectivity to the primary motor area (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), primary sensory area (S1) and contralateral dentate nucleus were identified. Additionally, volume of tissue activation (VTA) corresponding to active DBS contacts were modelled. Response to treatment was defined as 40% reduction in the total Fahn-Tolosa-Martin Tremor Rating Score (FTMTRS) with DBS-ON, one year from surgery. Three out of nine patients had a suboptimal, long-term response to treatment. The segmented thalamic areas corresponded well to anatomically known counterparts in the ventrolateral (VL) and ventroposterior (VP) thalamus. The dentate-thalamic area, lay within the M1-thalamic area in a ventral and lateral location. Streamlines corresponding to the DRT connected M1 to the contralateral dentate nucleus via the dentate-thalamic area, clearly crossing the midline in the mesencephalon. Good response was seen when the active contact VTA was in the thalamic area with highest connectivity to the contralateral dentate nucleus. Non-responders had active contact VTAs outside the dentate-thalamic area. We conclude that probabilistic tractography techniques can be used to segment the VL and VP thalamus based on cortical and cerebellar connectivity. The thalamic area, best representing the VIM, is connected to the contralateral dentate cerebellar nucleus. Connectivity based segmentation of the VIM can be achieved in individual patients in a clinically feasible timescale, using HARDI and high performance computing with parallel GPU processing. This same technique can map out the DRT tract with clear mesencephalic crossing. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:31:41Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:f631da5f-543c-40f4-98a6-f739fe7de2d7 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:31:41Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:f631da5f-543c-40f4-98a6-f739fe7de2d72022-03-27T12:33:19ZConnectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremorJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f631da5f-543c-40f4-98a6-f739fe7de2d7EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2018Akram, HDayal, VMahlknecht, PGeorgiev, DHyam, JFoltynie, TLimousin, PDe Vita, EJahanshahi, MAshburner, JBehrens, THariz, MZrinzo, LThe ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is an established surgical target for stereotactic ablation and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). It is centrally placed on a cerebello-thalamo-cortical network connecting the primary motor cortex, to the dentate nucleus of the contralateral cerebellum through the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT). The VIM is not readily visible on conventional MR imaging, so identifying the surgical target traditionally involved indirect targeting that relies on atlas-defined coordinates. Unfortunately, this approach does not fully account for individual variability and requires surgery to be performed with the patient awake to allow for intraoperative targeting confirmation. The aim of this study is to identify the VIM and the DRT using probabilistic tractography in patients that will undergo thalamic DBS for tremor. Four male patients with tremor dominant PD and five patients (three female) with ET underwent high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) (128 diffusion directions, 1.5 mm isotropic voxels and b value = 1500) preoperatively. Patients received VIM-DBS using an MR image guided and MR image verified approach with indirect targeting. Postoperatively, using parallel Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) processing, thalamic areas with the highest diffusion connectivity to the primary motor area (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), primary sensory area (S1) and contralateral dentate nucleus were identified. Additionally, volume of tissue activation (VTA) corresponding to active DBS contacts were modelled. Response to treatment was defined as 40% reduction in the total Fahn-Tolosa-Martin Tremor Rating Score (FTMTRS) with DBS-ON, one year from surgery. Three out of nine patients had a suboptimal, long-term response to treatment. The segmented thalamic areas corresponded well to anatomically known counterparts in the ventrolateral (VL) and ventroposterior (VP) thalamus. The dentate-thalamic area, lay within the M1-thalamic area in a ventral and lateral location. Streamlines corresponding to the DRT connected M1 to the contralateral dentate nucleus via the dentate-thalamic area, clearly crossing the midline in the mesencephalon. Good response was seen when the active contact VTA was in the thalamic area with highest connectivity to the contralateral dentate nucleus. Non-responders had active contact VTAs outside the dentate-thalamic area. We conclude that probabilistic tractography techniques can be used to segment the VL and VP thalamus based on cortical and cerebellar connectivity. The thalamic area, best representing the VIM, is connected to the contralateral dentate cerebellar nucleus. Connectivity based segmentation of the VIM can be achieved in individual patients in a clinically feasible timescale, using HARDI and high performance computing with parallel GPU processing. This same technique can map out the DRT tract with clear mesencephalic crossing. |
| spellingShingle | Akram, H Dayal, V Mahlknecht, P Georgiev, D Hyam, J Foltynie, T Limousin, P De Vita, E Jahanshahi, M Ashburner, J Behrens, T Hariz, M Zrinzo, L Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| title | Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| title_full | Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| title_fullStr | Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| title_full_unstemmed | Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| title_short | Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| title_sort | connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT akramh connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT dayalv connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT mahlknechtp connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT georgievd connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT hyamj connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT foltyniet connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT limousinp connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT devitae connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT jahanshahim connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT ashburnerj connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT behrenst connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT harizm connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor AT zrinzol connectivityderivedthalamicsegmentationindeepbrainstimulationfortremor |