Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate basic assumptions and other methodological problems in the application of indirect comparison in systematic reviews of competing healthcare interventions. DESIGN: Survey of published systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria Systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2007 i...
Main Authors: | Song, F, Loke, Y, Walsh, T, Glenny, A, Eastwood, A, Altman, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Similar Items
-
Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
by: Glenny, A, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
by: Song, F, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: Meta-epidemiological study
by: Song, F, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study.
by: Song, F, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Indirect comparison in evaluating relative efficacy illustrated by antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.
by: Song, F, et al.
Published: (2000)