Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research

Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research

One of the defining features of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) is the emphasis on reporting outcomes that are meaningful to patients. Accelerating progress toward this objective could be achieved through increased development and uptake of core outcome sets (COS), which are intended to re...

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät:	Tunis, S, Clarke, M, Gorst, S, Gargon, E, Blazeby, J, Altman, D, Williamson, P
Aineistotyyppi:	Journal article
Julkaistu:	Future Medicine 2016

Samankaltaisia teoksia

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated review and user survey.
Tekijä: Gorst, S, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
Tekijä: Davis, K, et al.
Julkaistu: (2018)

Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes.
Tekijä: Williamson, P, et al.
Julkaistu: (2012)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
Tekijä: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016-01-01)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.
Tekijä: Katherine Davis, et al.
Julkaistu: (2018-01-01)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
Tekijä: Gargon, E, et al.
Julkaistu: (2014)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015)
Tekijä: Gargon, E, et al.
Julkaistu: (2017)

Core outcome Set-STAndards for reporting: the COS-STAR statement
Tekijä: Kirkham, J, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016)

The need for consensus, consistency, and core outcome sets in perioperative research.
Tekijä: Blazeby, J, et al.
Julkaistu: (2015)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
Tekijä: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Julkaistu: (2019-01-01)

Core outcome Set-STAndardised protocol items: the COS-STAP statement
Tekijä: Kirkham, J, et al.
Julkaistu: (2019)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
Tekijä: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Julkaistu: (2014-01-01)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
Tekijä: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Julkaistu: (2021-01-01)

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
Tekijä: Williamson Paula R, et al.
Julkaistu: (2011-12-01)

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.
Tekijä: Williamson, P, et al.
Julkaistu: (2012)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.
Tekijä: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016-10-01)

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013.
Tekijä: Gargon, E, et al.
Julkaistu: (2014)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
Tekijä: Kirkham, J, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
Tekijä: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Julkaistu: (2018-01-01)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
Tekijä: Jamie J. Kirkham, et al.
Julkaistu: (2019-02-01)

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
Tekijä: Williamson Paula R, et al.
Julkaistu: (2012-08-01)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.
Tekijä: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Julkaistu: (2017-11-01)

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review
Tekijä: David Gathara, et al.
Julkaistu: (2021-10-01)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Tekijä: Kirkham Jamie J, et al.
Julkaistu: (2013-01-01)

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.
Tekijä: Williamson, P, et al.
Julkaistu: (2017)

Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
Tekijä: Tianjing Li, et al.
Julkaistu: (2020-09-01)

Methods used to assess outcome consistency in clinical studies: A literature-based evaluation.
Tekijä: Ewelina Rogozińska, et al.
Julkaistu: (2020-01-01)

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
Tekijä: Paula R. Williamson, et al.
Julkaistu: (2017-06-01)

Using qualitative methods to inform the trade-off between content validity and consistency in utility assessment: the example of type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's Disease
Tekijä: Gargon Elizabeth, et al.
Julkaistu: (2010-02-01)

Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.
Tekijä: Calvert, M, et al.
Julkaistu: (2013)

Building learning health systems to accelerate research and improve outcomes of clinical care in low- and middle-income countries.
Tekijä: English, M, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016)

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
Tekijä: Kirkham, J, et al.
Julkaistu: (2010)

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement
Tekijä: Zwarentein, M, et al.
Julkaistu: (2009)

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
Tekijä: Zwarenstein, M, et al.
Julkaistu: (2008)

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
Tekijä: Zwarenstein, M, et al.
Julkaistu: (2008)

Experiences of core outcome set developers on including stakeholders from low- and middle-income countries: An online survey.
Tekijä: Jamlick Karumbi, et al.
Julkaistu: (2024-01-01)

Consistency in marine heatwave experiments for ecological relevance and application: Key problems and solutions
Tekijä: Deevesh A. Hemraj, et al.
Julkaistu: (2025-02-01)

Awareness and experiences on core outcome set development and use amongst stakeholders from low- and middle- income countries: An online survey.
Tekijä: Jamlick Karumbi, et al.
Julkaistu: (2023-01-01)

Improving design and analysis of research: lessons from clinical research.
Tekijä: Altman, D
Julkaistu: (2004)

Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.
Tekijä: Williamson, P, et al.
Julkaistu: (2005)