Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research
One of the defining features of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) is the emphasis on reporting outcomes that are meaningful to patients. Accelerating progress toward this objective could be achieved through increased development and uptake of core outcome sets (COS), which are intended to re...
Main Authors: | Tunis, S, Clarke, M, Gorst, S, Gargon, E, Blazeby, J, Altman, D, Williamson, P |
---|---|
פורמט: | Journal article |
יצא לאור: |
Future Medicine
2016
|
פריטים דומים
-
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated review and user survey.
מאת: Gorst, S, et al.
יצא לאור: (2016) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
מאת: Davis, K, et al.
יצא לאור: (2018) -
Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes.
מאת: Williamson, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2012) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
מאת: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
יצא לאור: (2016-01-01) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.
מאת: Katherine Davis, et al.
יצא לאור: (2018-01-01)