The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)

D. 9,2,51, in which a slave is slain twice and dies, and where Julian considers both assailants equally liable for killing, has been interpreted in the context of causa superveniens. In that case Julian's opinion becomes contradictory. It is argued that the text should be read in the context of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sirks, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2011
_version_ 1826305464257740800
author Sirks, A
author_facet Sirks, A
author_sort Sirks, A
collection OXFORD
description D. 9,2,51, in which a slave is slain twice and dies, and where Julian considers both assailants equally liable for killing, has been interpreted in the context of causa superveniens. In that case Julian's opinion becomes contradictory. It is argued that the text should be read in the context of the Stoic theories on causality as current among the jurists in the first centuries AD. In these theories there existed no causa superveniens as of the modern causality theory. As such its application is ill at place here. Instead, in applying these Stoic theories Julian's view can be explained as his attributing a causa antecedens to the first assailant, with full imputation of the effect of the subsequent causa principalis to him, and attributing a causa adiuvans to the second assailant, while valuing at the same time the latter not just as a reinforcing cause but also as a causa mortis and a full effective cause. For other jurists the latter evidently went too far. © 2011 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:33:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f6c0a1d3-5fa9-4961-8f64-57874185f2f1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:33:14Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f6c0a1d3-5fa9-4961-8f64-57874185f2f12022-03-27T12:37:16ZThe slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f6c0a1d3-5fa9-4961-8f64-57874185f2f1EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Sirks, AD. 9,2,51, in which a slave is slain twice and dies, and where Julian considers both assailants equally liable for killing, has been interpreted in the context of causa superveniens. In that case Julian's opinion becomes contradictory. It is argued that the text should be read in the context of the Stoic theories on causality as current among the jurists in the first centuries AD. In these theories there existed no causa superveniens as of the modern causality theory. As such its application is ill at place here. Instead, in applying these Stoic theories Julian's view can be explained as his attributing a causa antecedens to the first assailant, with full imputation of the effect of the subsequent causa principalis to him, and attributing a causa adiuvans to the second assailant, while valuing at the same time the latter not just as a reinforcing cause but also as a causa mortis and a full effective cause. For other jurists the latter evidently went too far. © 2011 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
spellingShingle Sirks, A
The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)
title The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)
title_full The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)
title_fullStr The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)
title_full_unstemmed The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)
title_short The slave who was slain twice: Causality and the lex Aquilia (Iulian. 86 dig. D. 9,2,51)
title_sort slave who was slain twice causality and the lex aquilia iulian 86 dig d 9 2 51
work_keys_str_mv AT sirksa theslavewhowasslaintwicecausalityandthelexaquiliaiulian86digd9251
AT sirksa slavewhowasslaintwicecausalityandthelexaquiliaiulian86digd9251