Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND: Despite proven advantages of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), thrombolysis remains the first line treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) worldwide. Management of patients with failed thrombolysis is still debated, and data from existing randomized cont...
Автори: | Testa, L, van Gaal, W, Biondi-Zoccai, G, Abbate, A, Agostoni, P, Bhindi, R, Banning, A |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
2008
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
Coronary thrombolysis.
за авторством: Cairns, J, та інші
Опубліковано: (1989) -
Reperfusion therapy for STEMI: is there still a role for thrombolysis in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
за авторством: Gershlick, A, та інші
Опубліковано: (2013) -
Myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of troponin elevation applying the new universal definition.
за авторством: Testa, L, та інші
Опубліковано: (2009) -
Pexelizumab in ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 15,196 patients.
за авторством: Testa, L, та інші
Опубліковано: (2008) -
Successful thrombolysis in acute coronary syndrome
за авторством: Najlaa Salmi, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020-05-01)