Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND: Despite proven advantages of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), thrombolysis remains the first line treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) worldwide. Management of patients with failed thrombolysis is still debated, and data from existing randomized cont...
Main Authors: | Testa, L, van Gaal, W, Biondi-Zoccai, G, Abbate, A, Agostoni, P, Bhindi, R, Banning, A |
---|---|
格式: | Journal article |
语言: | English |
出版: |
2008
|
相似书籍
-
Coronary thrombolysis.
由: Cairns, J, et al.
出版: (1989) -
Reperfusion therapy for STEMI: is there still a role for thrombolysis in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
由: Gershlick, A, et al.
出版: (2013) -
Myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of troponin elevation applying the new universal definition.
由: Testa, L, et al.
出版: (2009) -
Pexelizumab in ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 15,196 patients.
由: Testa, L, et al.
出版: (2008) -
Successful thrombolysis in acute coronary syndrome
由: Najlaa Salmi, et al.
出版: (2020-05-01)