A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic
Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outc...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
| _version_ | 1797108469994618880 |
|---|---|
| author | Legate, N Nguyen, T-v Weinstein, N Vally, Z Johannes, N Pantazi, M Misiak, M Friedemann, M Pit, IL |
| author2 | Psychological Science Accelerator Self-Determination Theory Collaboration |
| author_facet | Psychological Science Accelerator Self-Determination Theory Collaboration Legate, N Nguyen, T-v Weinstein, N Vally, Z Johannes, N Pantazi, M Misiak, M Friedemann, M Pit, IL |
| author_sort | Legate, N |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:28:12Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:f7ba32e3-f6b0-46be-8d82-a3fa33509905 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:28:12Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:f7ba32e3-f6b0-46be-8d82-a3fa335099052022-12-02T14:25:28ZA global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemicJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f7ba32e3-f6b0-46be-8d82-a3fa33509905EnglishSymplectic ElementsNational Academy of Sciences2022Legate, NNguyen, T-vWeinstein, NVally, ZJohannes, NPantazi, MMisiak, MFriedemann, MPit, ILPsychological Science Accelerator Self-Determination Theory CollaborationFinding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges. |
| spellingShingle | Legate, N Nguyen, T-v Weinstein, N Vally, Z Johannes, N Pantazi, M Misiak, M Friedemann, M Pit, IL A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| title | A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| title_full | A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| title_fullStr | A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| title_full_unstemmed | A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| title_short | A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| title_sort | global experiment on motivating social distancing during the covid 19 pandemic |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT legaten aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT nguyentv aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT weinsteinn aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT vallyz aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT johannesn aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT pantazim aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT misiakm aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT friedemannm aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT pitil aglobalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT legaten globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT nguyentv globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT weinsteinn globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT vallyz globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT johannesn globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT pantazim globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT misiakm globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT friedemannm globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic AT pitil globalexperimentonmotivatingsocialdistancingduringthecovid19pandemic |