Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language

Vocabulary plays an important role in reading comprehension in both the L1 and the L2 (Murphy, 2018). In measuring vocabulary knowledge, however, researchers typically focus on mono-lexical units where vocabulary assessments tend not to take into account multi-word expressions which include phrasal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kan, RTY, Murphy, VA
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Department of English Studies 2020
_version_ 1797104637736648704
author Kan, RTY
Murphy, VA
author_facet Kan, RTY
Murphy, VA
author_sort Kan, RTY
collection OXFORD
description Vocabulary plays an important role in reading comprehension in both the L1 and the L2 (Murphy, 2018). In measuring vocabulary knowledge, however, researchers typically focus on mono-lexical units where vocabulary assessments tend not to take into account multi-word expressions which include phrasal verbs, collocations, and idioms. Omitting these multi-word lexical items can lead to an over-estimation of comprehension skills, particularly in reading. Indeed, adult learners of English comprehend texts containing a larger number of multi-word expressions less well compared to texts containing fewer of these expressions, even when the same words are used in each text (Martinez & Murphy, 2011). To investigate whether children learning English as an additional language (EAL) face a similar challenge, two reading comprehension tests were administered to EAL and monolingual (non-EAL) English-speaking children in primary school. Both tests contained the same common words, but whereas in one test some of the words occurred in multi-word expressions, in the other test they did not. Reading comprehension was significantly reduced for both groups of children when multi-word expressions were included. Monolingual participants generally performed better than children with EAL on both tests further suggesting that children with EAL may face a particular disadvantage in English reading comprehension. These results are discussed within the context of the importance of developing rich vocabulary knowledge in all children, and especially emergent bilingual children, within primary school and beyond.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:36:32Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f7db6a30-930f-4689-8f40-b00d93d5a4a1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:36:32Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Department of English Studies
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f7db6a30-930f-4689-8f40-b00d93d5a4a12022-03-27T12:45:42ZEffects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional languageJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f7db6a30-930f-4689-8f40-b00d93d5a4a1EnglishSymplectic ElementsAdam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Department of English Studies2020Kan, RTYMurphy, VAVocabulary plays an important role in reading comprehension in both the L1 and the L2 (Murphy, 2018). In measuring vocabulary knowledge, however, researchers typically focus on mono-lexical units where vocabulary assessments tend not to take into account multi-word expressions which include phrasal verbs, collocations, and idioms. Omitting these multi-word lexical items can lead to an over-estimation of comprehension skills, particularly in reading. Indeed, adult learners of English comprehend texts containing a larger number of multi-word expressions less well compared to texts containing fewer of these expressions, even when the same words are used in each text (Martinez & Murphy, 2011). To investigate whether children learning English as an additional language (EAL) face a similar challenge, two reading comprehension tests were administered to EAL and monolingual (non-EAL) English-speaking children in primary school. Both tests contained the same common words, but whereas in one test some of the words occurred in multi-word expressions, in the other test they did not. Reading comprehension was significantly reduced for both groups of children when multi-word expressions were included. Monolingual participants generally performed better than children with EAL on both tests further suggesting that children with EAL may face a particular disadvantage in English reading comprehension. These results are discussed within the context of the importance of developing rich vocabulary knowledge in all children, and especially emergent bilingual children, within primary school and beyond.
spellingShingle Kan, RTY
Murphy, VA
Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language
title Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language
title_full Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language
title_fullStr Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language
title_full_unstemmed Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language
title_short Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language
title_sort effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with english as an additional language
work_keys_str_mv AT kanrty effectsoffrequencyandidiomaticityonsecondlanguagereadingcomprehensioninchildrenwithenglishasanadditionallanguage
AT murphyva effectsoffrequencyandidiomaticityonsecondlanguagereadingcomprehensioninchildrenwithenglishasanadditionallanguage