Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'

In our recent paper on the clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine (Watson et al., 2022), we used all available individual patient pharmacometric data from the tafenoquine pre-registration clinical efficacy trials to characterise the determinants of anti-relapse efficacy in tropical vivax malaria. We c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Watson, JA, Commons, RJ, Tarning, J, Simpson, JA, Llanos Cuentas, A, Lacerda, MVG, Green, JA, Koh, GCKW, Chu, CS, Nosten, FH, Price, RN, Day, NPJ, White, NJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications 2024
_version_ 1797112647160692736
author Watson, JA
Commons, RJ
Tarning, J
Simpson, JA
Llanos Cuentas, A
Lacerda, MVG
Green, JA
Koh, GCKW
Chu, CS
Nosten, FH
Price, RN
Day, NPJ
White, NJ
author_facet Watson, JA
Commons, RJ
Tarning, J
Simpson, JA
Llanos Cuentas, A
Lacerda, MVG
Green, JA
Koh, GCKW
Chu, CS
Nosten, FH
Price, RN
Day, NPJ
White, NJ
author_sort Watson, JA
collection OXFORD
description In our recent paper on the clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine (Watson et al., 2022), we used all available individual patient pharmacometric data from the tafenoquine pre-registration clinical efficacy trials to characterise the determinants of anti-relapse efficacy in tropical vivax malaria. We concluded that the currently recommended dose of tafenoquine (300 mg in adults, average dose of 5 mg/kg) is insufficient for cure in all adults, and a 50% increase to 450 mg (7.5 mg/kg) would halve the risk of vivax recurrence by four months. We recommended that clinical trials of higher doses should be carried out to assess their safety and tolerability. Sharma and colleagues at the pharmaceutical company GSK defend the currently recommended adult dose of 300 mg as the optimum balance between radical curative efficacy and haemolytic toxicity (Sharma et al., 2024). We contend that the relative haemolytic risks of the 300 mg and 450 mg doses have not been sufficiently well characterised to justify this opinion. In contrast, we provided evidence that the currently recommended 300 mg dose results in sub-maximal efficacy, and that prospective clinical trials of higher doses are warranted to assess their risks and benefits.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:27:00Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f82de108-98d2-44d9-afde-9a464eaa6ba1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:27:00Z
publishDate 2024
publisher eLife Sciences Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f82de108-98d2-44d9-afde-9a464eaa6ba12024-02-19T17:14:16ZResponse to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:f82de108-98d2-44d9-afde-9a464eaa6ba1EnglishSymplectic ElementseLife Sciences Publications2024Watson, JACommons, RJTarning, JSimpson, JALlanos Cuentas, ALacerda, MVGGreen, JAKoh, GCKWChu, CSNosten, FHPrice, RNDay, NPJWhite, NJIn our recent paper on the clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine (Watson et al., 2022), we used all available individual patient pharmacometric data from the tafenoquine pre-registration clinical efficacy trials to characterise the determinants of anti-relapse efficacy in tropical vivax malaria. We concluded that the currently recommended dose of tafenoquine (300 mg in adults, average dose of 5 mg/kg) is insufficient for cure in all adults, and a 50% increase to 450 mg (7.5 mg/kg) would halve the risk of vivax recurrence by four months. We recommended that clinical trials of higher doses should be carried out to assess their safety and tolerability. Sharma and colleagues at the pharmaceutical company GSK defend the currently recommended adult dose of 300 mg as the optimum balance between radical curative efficacy and haemolytic toxicity (Sharma et al., 2024). We contend that the relative haemolytic risks of the 300 mg and 450 mg doses have not been sufficiently well characterised to justify this opinion. In contrast, we provided evidence that the currently recommended 300 mg dose results in sub-maximal efficacy, and that prospective clinical trials of higher doses are warranted to assess their risks and benefits.
spellingShingle Watson, JA
Commons, RJ
Tarning, J
Simpson, JA
Llanos Cuentas, A
Lacerda, MVG
Green, JA
Koh, GCKW
Chu, CS
Nosten, FH
Price, RN
Day, NPJ
White, NJ
Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'
title Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'
title_full Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'
title_fullStr Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'
title_full_unstemmed Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'
title_short Response to comment on 'The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis'
title_sort response to comment on the clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of plasmodium vivax malaria an individual patient data meta analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonja responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT commonsrj responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT tarningj responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT simpsonja responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT llanoscuentasa responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT lacerdamvg responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT greenja responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT kohgckw responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT chucs responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT nostenfh responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT pricern responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT daynpj responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT whitenj responsetocommentontheclinicalpharmacologyoftafenoquineintheradicalcureofplasmodiumvivaxmalariaanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis