When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review,...
Main Authors: | Garner, P, Hopewell, S, Chandler, J, MacLehose, H, Schünemann, H, Akl, E, Beyene, J, Chang, S, Churchill, R, Dearness, K, Guyatt, G, Lefebvre, C, Liles, B, Marshall, R, Martínez García, L, Mavergames, C, Nasser, M, Qaseem, A, Sampson, M, Soares-Weiser, K, Takwoingi, Y, Thabane, L, Trivella, M, Tugwell, P, Welsh, E, Wilson, E |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Similar Items
-
95818 Physical and Cognitive Resilience and Alzheimer’s Disease in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastic Community
by: Tenzin Namdul, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Intrarectal quinine for treating <it>Plasmodium falciparum </it>malaria: a systematic review
by: Omari Aika, et al.
Published: (2005-05-01) -
GRADE Guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes—Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies
by: Goldkuhle, M, et al.
Published: (2020) -
A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.
by: Takwoingi, Y, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Application of the Adaptive Validation Substudy Design to Colorectal Cancer Recurrence
by: Collin LJ, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)