COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP

The present study considers spatially-resolved surface heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures on a turbine blade tip in a linear cascade under transonic conditions. Six different measurement and processing techniques are considered and compared, including transient infrared therm...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: O'Dowd, D, Zhang, Q, Ligrani, P, He, L, Friedrichs, S, ASME
Format: Conference item
Wydane: 2009
_version_ 1826305924777639936
author O'Dowd, D
Zhang, Q
Ligrani, P
He, L
Friedrichs, S
ASME
author_facet O'Dowd, D
Zhang, Q
Ligrani, P
He, L
Friedrichs, S
ASME
author_sort O'Dowd, D
collection OXFORD
description The present study considers spatially-resolved surface heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures on a turbine blade tip in a linear cascade under transonic conditions. Six different measurement and processing techniques are considered and compared, including transient infrared thermography and thin-film heat flux gauges. Three methods use the same experimental setup, using a heater mesh to provide a near-instantaneous step-change in mainstream temperature, employing an infrared camera to measure surface temperature. The three methods use the same data but different processing techniques to determine the heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. Two methods use different processing techniques to reconstruct heat flux from the temperature time trace measured. A plot of the heat flux versus temperature is used to determine the heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. The third uses the classical solution to the 1-D non-steady Fourier equation to determine heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. A fourth method uses regression analysis to calculate detailed heat transfer coefficients for a quasi-steady state condition using a thin-foil heater on the tip surface. The fifth method uses the infrared camera to measure the adiabatic wall temperature surface distribution of a blade tip after a quasi-steady state condition is present. Finally, the sixth method employs thin-film gauges to measure surface temperature histories at four discreet blade tip locations. With this approach, heat flux reconstruction is used to calculate the transient heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. Overall, the present study shows that the infrared thermography technique with heat flux reconstruction using the Impulse method, is the most accurate and reliable method to obtain detailed, spatially-resolved heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures on a turbine blade tip in a linear cascade. Copyright © 2009 by ASME.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:40:12Z
format Conference item
id oxford-uuid:f902cacf-338c-4b5a-961d-580361347a61
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:40:12Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f902cacf-338c-4b5a-961d-580361347a612022-03-27T12:54:46ZCOMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIPConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:f902cacf-338c-4b5a-961d-580361347a61Symplectic Elements at Oxford2009O'Dowd, DZhang, QLigrani, PHe, LFriedrichs, SASMEThe present study considers spatially-resolved surface heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures on a turbine blade tip in a linear cascade under transonic conditions. Six different measurement and processing techniques are considered and compared, including transient infrared thermography and thin-film heat flux gauges. Three methods use the same experimental setup, using a heater mesh to provide a near-instantaneous step-change in mainstream temperature, employing an infrared camera to measure surface temperature. The three methods use the same data but different processing techniques to determine the heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. Two methods use different processing techniques to reconstruct heat flux from the temperature time trace measured. A plot of the heat flux versus temperature is used to determine the heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. The third uses the classical solution to the 1-D non-steady Fourier equation to determine heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. A fourth method uses regression analysis to calculate detailed heat transfer coefficients for a quasi-steady state condition using a thin-foil heater on the tip surface. The fifth method uses the infrared camera to measure the adiabatic wall temperature surface distribution of a blade tip after a quasi-steady state condition is present. Finally, the sixth method employs thin-film gauges to measure surface temperature histories at four discreet blade tip locations. With this approach, heat flux reconstruction is used to calculate the transient heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures. Overall, the present study shows that the infrared thermography technique with heat flux reconstruction using the Impulse method, is the most accurate and reliable method to obtain detailed, spatially-resolved heat transfer coefficients and adiabatic wall temperatures on a turbine blade tip in a linear cascade. Copyright © 2009 by ASME.
spellingShingle O'Dowd, D
Zhang, Q
Ligrani, P
He, L
Friedrichs, S
ASME
COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP
title COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP
title_full COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP
title_short COMPARISON OF HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES ON A TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE TIP
title_sort comparison of heat transfer measurement techniques on a transonic turbine blade tip
work_keys_str_mv AT odowdd comparisonofheattransfermeasurementtechniquesonatransonicturbinebladetip
AT zhangq comparisonofheattransfermeasurementtechniquesonatransonicturbinebladetip
AT ligranip comparisonofheattransfermeasurementtechniquesonatransonicturbinebladetip
AT hel comparisonofheattransfermeasurementtechniquesonatransonicturbinebladetip
AT friedrichss comparisonofheattransfermeasurementtechniquesonatransonicturbinebladetip
AT asme comparisonofheattransfermeasurementtechniquesonatransonicturbinebladetip