Generating and using examples in the proving process

We report on our analysis of data from a dataset of 26 videotapes of university students working in groups of 2 and 3 on different proving problems. Our aim is to understand the role of example generation in the proving process, focusing on deliberate changes in representation and symbol manipulatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandefur, J, Mason, J, Stylianides, G, Watson, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1797104923214610432
author Sandefur, J
Mason, J
Stylianides, G
Watson, A
author_facet Sandefur, J
Mason, J
Stylianides, G
Watson, A
author_sort Sandefur, J
collection OXFORD
description We report on our analysis of data from a dataset of 26 videotapes of university students working in groups of 2 and 3 on different proving problems. Our aim is to understand the role of example generation in the proving process, focusing on deliberate changes in representation and symbol manipulation. We suggest and illustrate four aspects of situations in which example generation seems to play a positive role in proving. These aspects integrate qualities of students and of problems: experience of utility of examples in proving, personal example spaces and technical tools, formulation of the problem, and relational necessity. Our analysis led to integrating two theoretical ideas: the alignment of conceptual insight and technical handle when trying to prove; and manipulating, getting-a-sense-of, and articulating as phases of work associated with example construction. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:40:19Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f91002d3-4d76-443d-986d-f444a1ae645f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:40:19Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f91002d3-4d76-443d-986d-f444a1ae645f2022-03-27T12:55:04ZGenerating and using examples in the proving processJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f91002d3-4d76-443d-986d-f444a1ae645fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Sandefur, JMason, JStylianides, GWatson, AWe report on our analysis of data from a dataset of 26 videotapes of university students working in groups of 2 and 3 on different proving problems. Our aim is to understand the role of example generation in the proving process, focusing on deliberate changes in representation and symbol manipulation. We suggest and illustrate four aspects of situations in which example generation seems to play a positive role in proving. These aspects integrate qualities of students and of problems: experience of utility of examples in proving, personal example spaces and technical tools, formulation of the problem, and relational necessity. Our analysis led to integrating two theoretical ideas: the alignment of conceptual insight and technical handle when trying to prove; and manipulating, getting-a-sense-of, and articulating as phases of work associated with example construction. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
spellingShingle Sandefur, J
Mason, J
Stylianides, G
Watson, A
Generating and using examples in the proving process
title Generating and using examples in the proving process
title_full Generating and using examples in the proving process
title_fullStr Generating and using examples in the proving process
title_full_unstemmed Generating and using examples in the proving process
title_short Generating and using examples in the proving process
title_sort generating and using examples in the proving process
work_keys_str_mv AT sandefurj generatingandusingexamplesintheprovingprocess
AT masonj generatingandusingexamplesintheprovingprocess
AT stylianidesg generatingandusingexamplesintheprovingprocess
AT watsona generatingandusingexamplesintheprovingprocess