Engaging with Buddhism
In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
_version_ | 1826306052993318912 |
---|---|
author | Avramides, A |
author_facet | Avramides, A |
author_sort | Avramides, A |
collection | OXFORD |
description | In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda (“Personalists”). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:42:05Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:f9a56f63-3366-4071-8af3-cf501245371e |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:42:05Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:f9a56f63-3366-4071-8af3-cf501245371e2022-03-27T12:59:26ZEngaging with BuddhismJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f9a56f63-3366-4071-8af3-cf501245371eSymplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Netherlands2018Avramides, AIn his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda (“Personalists”). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson. |
spellingShingle | Avramides, A Engaging with Buddhism |
title | Engaging with Buddhism |
title_full | Engaging with Buddhism |
title_fullStr | Engaging with Buddhism |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging with Buddhism |
title_short | Engaging with Buddhism |
title_sort | engaging with buddhism |
work_keys_str_mv | AT avramidesa engagingwithbuddhism |