Engaging with Buddhism

In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Avramides, A
Format: Journal article
Published: Springer Netherlands 2018
_version_ 1826306052993318912
author Avramides, A
author_facet Avramides, A
author_sort Avramides, A
collection OXFORD
description In his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda (“Personalists”). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:42:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f9a56f63-3366-4071-8af3-cf501245371e
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:42:05Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f9a56f63-3366-4071-8af3-cf501245371e2022-03-27T12:59:26ZEngaging with BuddhismJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f9a56f63-3366-4071-8af3-cf501245371eSymplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Netherlands2018Avramides, AIn his new book, Jay Garfield invites philosophers of all persuasions to engage with Buddhist philosophy. In part I of this paper, I raise some questions on behalf of the philosopher working in the analytic tradition about the way in which Buddhist philosophy understands itself. I then turn, in part II, to look at what Orthodox Buddhism has to say about the self. I examine the debate between the Buddhist position discussed and endorsed by Garfield and that of a lesser-known school that he mentions only briefly, the Pudgalavāda (“Personalists”). I suggest that the views of the Pudgalavādins are strikingly similar to a position held, in the twentieth century analytic philosophy, by Peter Strawson.
spellingShingle Avramides, A
Engaging with Buddhism
title Engaging with Buddhism
title_full Engaging with Buddhism
title_fullStr Engaging with Buddhism
title_full_unstemmed Engaging with Buddhism
title_short Engaging with Buddhism
title_sort engaging with buddhism
work_keys_str_mv AT avramidesa engagingwithbuddhism