A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.

BACKGROUND: the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People has developed a clinical definition of sarcopenia based on low muscle mass and reduced muscle function (strength or performance). Grip strength is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength when 'measured in stand...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Roberts, H, Denison, H, Martin, H, Patel, H, Syddall, H, Cooper, C, Sayer, A
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: 2011
_version_ 1826306060343836672
author Roberts, H
Denison, H
Martin, H
Patel, H
Syddall, H
Cooper, C
Sayer, A
author_facet Roberts, H
Denison, H
Martin, H
Patel, H
Syddall, H
Cooper, C
Sayer, A
author_sort Roberts, H
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People has developed a clinical definition of sarcopenia based on low muscle mass and reduced muscle function (strength or performance). Grip strength is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength when 'measured in standard conditions'. However, standard conditions remain to be defined. METHODS: a literature search was conducted to review articles describing the measurement of grip strength listed in Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 December 2009. RESULTS: there is wide variability in the choice of equipment and protocol for measuring grip strength. The Jamar hand dynamometer is the most widely used instrument with established test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. However, there is considerable variation in how it is used and studies often provide insufficient information on the protocol followed making comparisons difficult. There is evidence that variation in approach can affect the values recorded. Furthermore, reported summary measures of grip strength vary widely including maximum or mean value, from one, two or three attempts, with either hand or the dominant hand alone. CONCLUSIONS: there is considerable variation in current methods of assessing grip strength which makes comparison between studies difficult. A standardised method would enable more consistent measurement of grip strength and better assessment of sarcopenia. Our approach is described.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:42:12Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:f9aeb4f7-5c67-4a99-99c6-e38c344e09c0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:42:12Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:f9aeb4f7-5c67-4a99-99c6-e38c344e09c02022-03-27T12:59:45ZA review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:f9aeb4f7-5c67-4a99-99c6-e38c344e09c0EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Roberts, HDenison, HMartin, HPatel, HSyddall, HCooper, CSayer, ABACKGROUND: the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People has developed a clinical definition of sarcopenia based on low muscle mass and reduced muscle function (strength or performance). Grip strength is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength when 'measured in standard conditions'. However, standard conditions remain to be defined. METHODS: a literature search was conducted to review articles describing the measurement of grip strength listed in Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 December 2009. RESULTS: there is wide variability in the choice of equipment and protocol for measuring grip strength. The Jamar hand dynamometer is the most widely used instrument with established test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. However, there is considerable variation in how it is used and studies often provide insufficient information on the protocol followed making comparisons difficult. There is evidence that variation in approach can affect the values recorded. Furthermore, reported summary measures of grip strength vary widely including maximum or mean value, from one, two or three attempts, with either hand or the dominant hand alone. CONCLUSIONS: there is considerable variation in current methods of assessing grip strength which makes comparison between studies difficult. A standardised method would enable more consistent measurement of grip strength and better assessment of sarcopenia. Our approach is described.
spellingShingle Roberts, H
Denison, H
Martin, H
Patel, H
Syddall, H
Cooper, C
Sayer, A
A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
title A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
title_full A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
title_fullStr A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
title_full_unstemmed A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
title_short A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.
title_sort review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies towards a standardised approach
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsh areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT denisonh areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT martinh areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT patelh areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT syddallh areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT cooperc areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT sayera areviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT robertsh reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT denisonh reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT martinh reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT patelh reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT syddallh reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT cooperc reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach
AT sayera reviewofthemeasurementofgripstrengthinclinicalandepidemiologicalstudiestowardsastandardisedapproach