Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence.

Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy for prostate cancer because men with negative biopsy do not undergo radical prostatectomy and thus have no confirmation of biopsy findings. METHODS: We performed 18-core needle biopsies on autopsy prostates from 164 men who h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Haas, G, Delongchamps, N, Jones, R, Chandan, V, Serio, A, Vickers, A, Jumbelic, M, Threatte, G, Korets, R, Lilja, H, de la Roza, G
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2007

Similar Items

Fine needle aspiration biopsy, core needle biopsy or excision biopsy to diagnose breast cancer - which is the ideal method?
by: Tham, T., et al.
Published: (2009)

Design of an endoscopic biopsy needle with flexural members
by: Figueredo, Stacy L. (Stacy Lee), 1981-
Published: (2007)

The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Prostate specific antigen velocity does not aid prostate cancer detection in men with prior negative biopsy.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Comparison of Immunohistochemical Markers in Core Needle Biopsy and Excisional Biopsy in Breast Carcinoma
by: ALFATIH P.,, et al.
Published: (2015)

Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
by: Ankerst, D, et al.
Published: (2014)

Follow-up of men with elevated prostate-specific antigen and one set of benign biopsies at prostate cancer screening.
by: Zackrisson, B, et al.
Published: (2003)

Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
by: Ankerst, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Tumour seeding following percutaneous needle biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma
by: Qua, C.S., et al.
Published: (2008)

A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Goteborg, Sweden.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2008)

A panel of kallikrein markers can predict outcome of prostate biopsy following clinical work-up: an independent validation study from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening, France.
by: Benchikh, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Percutaneous image-guided cutting needle biopsy of the pleura in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.
by: Adams, R, et al.
Published: (2001)

Percutaneous image-guided cutting needle biopsy of the pleura in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma
by: Adams, R, et al.
Published: (2001)

Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group.
by: Roobol, M, et al.
Published: (2012)

A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands.
by: Gupta, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

Comparison of prostate biopsy with or without pre-biopsy multi-parametric MRI in prostate cancer detection: an observational cohort study
by: Bryant, R, et al.
Published: (2018)

Perspectives on technology - prostate cancer: is local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy really better than transrectal biopsy?
by: Berridge, C, et al.
Published: (2024)

Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

A low cost solution for post-biopsy complications using available RFA generator and coaxial core biopsy needle
by: Azlan, C.A., et al.
Published: (2007)

Long-term prediction of prostate cancer up to 25 years before diagnosis of prostate cancer using prostate kallikreins measured at age 44 to 50 years.
by: Lilja, H, et al.
Published: (2007)

Predictors of attendance for prostate-specific antigen screening tests and prostate biopsy.
by: Avery, K, et al.
Published: (2012)

Predictors of attendance for prostate-specific antigen screening tests and prostate biopsy
by: Avery, K, et al.
Published: (2012)

Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer: prediction, detection and monitoring.
by: Lilja, H, et al.
Published: (2008)

Standard pleural biopsy versus CT-guided cutting-needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant disease in pleural effusions: a randomised controlled trial.
by: Maskell, N, et al.
Published: (2003)

Free PSA isoforms and intact and cleaved forms of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in serum improve selection of patients for prostate cancer biopsy.
by: Steuber, T, et al.
Published: (2007)

Multimodal spectroscopy : real-time diagnosis of breast cancer during core needle biopsy
by: Volynskaya, Zoya I
Published: (2011)

Sensitivity and specificity test of fine needle aspiration biopsy in determining thyroid nodule diagnosis
by: Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
Published: (2010)

Models to predict positive prostate biopsies using the Tyrol screening study.
by: Sooriakumaran, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Prostate cancer: estimating the benefits of PSA screening.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
by: Leow, Jeffrey J., et al.
Published: (2023)

Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands
by: Tops, SCM, et al.
Published: (2020)

Autopsy: not dead.
by: Esiri, M, et al.
Published: (2006)

Screening for prostate cancer.
by: Carlsson, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

Screening for prostate cancer: To the editor
by: Carlsson, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

Urological cancer: Time for another rethink on prostate cancer screening.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2012)

Factors that affect the outcome of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
by: Fones, Dylan Jin Kheng
Published: (2017)

Patients' perceptions of transrectal prostate biopsy: a qualitative study.
by: Chapple, A, et al.
Published: (2007)

Transperineal prostate biopsy: analysis of a uniform core sampling pattern that yields data on tumor volume limits in negative biopsies
by: Kepner, Gordon R., et al.
Published: (2012)

Predicting prostate cancer many years before diagnosis: how and why?
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2012)