Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.

The effect of distractor load on visual search was examined in a patient with visual neglect following infarction of the right frontal lobe. The spatial extent of his left-sided neglect was modified greatly by changing stimulus attributes. When targets were highly discriminable compared to distracto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Husain, M, Kennard, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1997
_version_ 1797105175964418048
author Husain, M
Kennard, C
author_facet Husain, M
Kennard, C
author_sort Husain, M
collection OXFORD
description The effect of distractor load on visual search was examined in a patient with visual neglect following infarction of the right frontal lobe. The spatial extent of his left-sided neglect was modified greatly by changing stimulus attributes. When targets were highly discriminable compared to distractors, or distractor density was low, or when the subject was asked to cancel distractors as well as targets, he was able to direct his search to the extreme left of search arrays and there was little or no evidence of neglect. By contrast, similar changes in distractor load had little or no effect on the neglect of a patient with a fronto-parietal lesion. These findings suggest that distractability towards ipsilesional stimuli may be an important component of neglect in individuals with only frontal lobe injury.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:43:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:fa2a944b-8a99-434e-9764-a76257a41169
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:43:43Z
publishDate 1997
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:fa2a944b-8a99-434e-9764-a76257a411692022-03-27T13:03:32ZDistractor-dependent frontal neglect.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fa2a944b-8a99-434e-9764-a76257a41169EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1997Husain, MKennard, CThe effect of distractor load on visual search was examined in a patient with visual neglect following infarction of the right frontal lobe. The spatial extent of his left-sided neglect was modified greatly by changing stimulus attributes. When targets were highly discriminable compared to distractors, or distractor density was low, or when the subject was asked to cancel distractors as well as targets, he was able to direct his search to the extreme left of search arrays and there was little or no evidence of neglect. By contrast, similar changes in distractor load had little or no effect on the neglect of a patient with a fronto-parietal lesion. These findings suggest that distractability towards ipsilesional stimuli may be an important component of neglect in individuals with only frontal lobe injury.
spellingShingle Husain, M
Kennard, C
Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.
title Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.
title_full Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.
title_fullStr Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.
title_full_unstemmed Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.
title_short Distractor-dependent frontal neglect.
title_sort distractor dependent frontal neglect
work_keys_str_mv AT husainm distractordependentfrontalneglect
AT kennardc distractordependentfrontalneglect