Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines

Based on a 2010-11 study involving senior researchers from seven disciplines, this article explores critically some of the diverse interpretations of impact in different disciplines, sub-fields and modes of research, and researchers' views about how these interpretations articulate with top-dow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oancea, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: European Educational Research Association 2013
_version_ 1797105259790729216
author Oancea, A
author_facet Oancea, A
author_sort Oancea, A
collection OXFORD
description Based on a 2010-11 study involving senior researchers from seven disciplines, this article explores critically some of the diverse interpretations of impact in different disciplines, sub-fields and modes of research, and researchers' views about how these interpretations articulate with top-down impact agendas and with university structures and incentive systems. Among the participants in the study, humanities researchers referred more explicitly to disciplines in framing their definitions of impact; social researchers, to theoretical and methodological traditions of research; and physical scientists, to modes of research (such as applied and theoretical). The article highlights the limits of unidirectional and short-term notions of impact and of pressures to demonstrate chain-link trajectories of influence from research insights to non-academic changes and benefits. Nonetheless, it argues that the current context offers an important (though easy-to-miss) opportunity to debate and reconceptualise 'impact' and its relevance to accountability processes, and to re-calibrate assessment methodologies.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:44:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:fa90fdf4-0948-4d26-a758-b1e0d76a175f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:44:58Z
publishDate 2013
publisher European Educational Research Association
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:fa90fdf4-0948-4d26-a758-b1e0d76a175f2022-03-27T13:06:47ZInterpretations of research impact in seven disciplinesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fa90fdf4-0948-4d26-a758-b1e0d76a175fEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordEuropean Educational Research Association2013Oancea, ABased on a 2010-11 study involving senior researchers from seven disciplines, this article explores critically some of the diverse interpretations of impact in different disciplines, sub-fields and modes of research, and researchers' views about how these interpretations articulate with top-down impact agendas and with university structures and incentive systems. Among the participants in the study, humanities researchers referred more explicitly to disciplines in framing their definitions of impact; social researchers, to theoretical and methodological traditions of research; and physical scientists, to modes of research (such as applied and theoretical). The article highlights the limits of unidirectional and short-term notions of impact and of pressures to demonstrate chain-link trajectories of influence from research insights to non-academic changes and benefits. Nonetheless, it argues that the current context offers an important (though easy-to-miss) opportunity to debate and reconceptualise 'impact' and its relevance to accountability processes, and to re-calibrate assessment methodologies.
spellingShingle Oancea, A
Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
title Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
title_full Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
title_fullStr Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
title_full_unstemmed Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
title_short Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
title_sort interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines
work_keys_str_mv AT oanceaa interpretationsofresearchimpactinsevendisciplines