Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article
Several tools have been developed to evaluate the extent to which the findings from a network meta-analysis would be valid; however, applying these tools is a time-consuming task and often requires specific expertise. Clinicians have little time for critical appraisal, and they need to understand th...
Autors principals: | Chaimani, A, Salanti, G, Leucht, S, Geddes, JR, Cipriani, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicat: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Ítems similars
-
Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines
per: Leucht, S, et al.
Publicat: (2016) -
Why Should Clinicians Publish?
per: Rijo Mathew Choorakuttil
Publicat: (2018-12-01) -
Common Mistakes and Pitfalls in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee
per: Filip Vanhoenacker, et al.
Publicat: (2016-11-01) -
Placebo response rates in antidepressant trials: a systematic review of published and unpublished double-blind randomised controlled studies
per: Furukawa, T, et al.
Publicat: (2016) -
60 years of placebo-controlled antipsychotic drug trials in acute schizophrenia: Meta-regression of predictors of placebo response
per: Leucht, S, et al.
Publicat: (2018)