Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.

BACKGROUND: In order to minimise the risk of blood transfusion errors, all healthcare professionals who participate in the transfusion process are required to be assessed as competent. New and innovative methods of training and competency assessment are required to improve the training process. AIM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sellu, D, Davis, R, Vincent, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1797105379371384832
author Sellu, D
Davis, R
Vincent, C
author_facet Sellu, D
Davis, R
Vincent, C
author_sort Sellu, D
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: In order to minimise the risk of blood transfusion errors, all healthcare professionals who participate in the transfusion process are required to be assessed as competent. New and innovative methods of training and competency assessment are required to improve the training process. AIM/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the use of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in the assessment of competencies for blood administration. DESIGN: A mixed-methods approach was employed using structured observations of simulated practice through a three station OSCE to assess three stages of the blood transfusion process: (i) communication; (ii) documentation and (iii) identification of patients and blood products. Nurses and midwives were assessed using a 28-item checklist that was rated on a 5-point Bondy scale. After the OSCE, a questionnaire was given to participants to evaluate their attitudes. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty four midwives and nurses from 10 different clinical areas in a District General Hospital in London. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability between assessors was high (>0.8). Overall assessors scored participants highest on aseptic technique (97%) and lowest for positive patient identification (81%). Participants felt that the OSCE was a useful intervention and could contribute to improving the competences of staff in blood transfusion safety. CONCLUSION: A simulation OSCE is valid and reliable for competency asessment in blood administration. The checklist is simple to complete and can be used to identify weaknesses and evaluate learning needs of staff in blood administration.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:46:41Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:fb163eb7-76c8-4299-a1d0-af87fcef03d1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:46:41Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:fb163eb7-76c8-4299-a1d0-af87fcef03d12022-03-27T13:11:13ZAssessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fb163eb7-76c8-4299-a1d0-af87fcef03d1EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Sellu, DDavis, RVincent, C BACKGROUND: In order to minimise the risk of blood transfusion errors, all healthcare professionals who participate in the transfusion process are required to be assessed as competent. New and innovative methods of training and competency assessment are required to improve the training process. AIM/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the use of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in the assessment of competencies for blood administration. DESIGN: A mixed-methods approach was employed using structured observations of simulated practice through a three station OSCE to assess three stages of the blood transfusion process: (i) communication; (ii) documentation and (iii) identification of patients and blood products. Nurses and midwives were assessed using a 28-item checklist that was rated on a 5-point Bondy scale. After the OSCE, a questionnaire was given to participants to evaluate their attitudes. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty four midwives and nurses from 10 different clinical areas in a District General Hospital in London. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability between assessors was high (>0.8). Overall assessors scored participants highest on aseptic technique (97%) and lowest for positive patient identification (81%). Participants felt that the OSCE was a useful intervention and could contribute to improving the competences of staff in blood transfusion safety. CONCLUSION: A simulation OSCE is valid and reliable for competency asessment in blood administration. The checklist is simple to complete and can be used to identify weaknesses and evaluate learning needs of staff in blood administration.
spellingShingle Sellu, D
Davis, R
Vincent, C
Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.
title Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.
title_full Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.
title_fullStr Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.
title_short Assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination.
title_sort assessment of blood administration competencies using objective structured clinical examination
work_keys_str_mv AT sellud assessmentofbloodadministrationcompetenciesusingobjectivestructuredclinicalexamination
AT davisr assessmentofbloodadministrationcompetenciesusingobjectivestructuredclinicalexamination
AT vincentc assessmentofbloodadministrationcompetenciesusingobjectivestructuredclinicalexamination