Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar
The main part of this thesis is a survey of Pindar's treatment, in his epinicians, of myths involving the mythological family of the Aiakids. I establish what may be known of Pindar's sources for these stories, and then compare his own accounts. I consider (together with some minor incide...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | Greek, Ancient (to 1453) English |
| Published: |
1993
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797105388252823552 |
|---|---|
| author | Mann, R Mann, Rupert |
| author_facet | Mann, R Mann, Rupert |
| author_sort | Mann, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The main part of this thesis is a survey of Pindar's treatment, in his epinicians, of myths involving the mythological family of the Aiakids. I establish what may be known of Pindar's sources for these stories, and then compare his own accounts. I consider (together with some minor incidents) Aiakos' assist- ance in building the walls of Troy; Phokos' murder; Peleus' experience with Hippolyta and Akastos, and his marriage to Thetis; Telamon's participation in Herakles' expedition against Troy; Achilles' infancy, his combats against Telephos, Kyknos, Hektor and Memnon, and his own fate; Aias' birth and suicide; and finally the story of Neoptolemos' visit to Delphi (chapters 1-7). My major conclusion is that his versions of these myths are more firmly grounded in the mythological tradition than is widely believed: they are constantly allusive, and contain little innovation. What changes there are may be ascribed to a broad rationalizing tendency, rather than to sophisticated poetic purposes. Pindar seems to prefer lesser known, often locally preserved, strands of tradition, but is concerned to produce authoritative accounts of them. The defensive tone of N. 7 may be satisfactorily explained by his care to produce such an account from confused and undignified material; the poem does not contain an apology for a hostile treatment of Neo- ptolemos in Pae.6. In chapter 8, I confirm my conclusions by examining three difficult cases: the myths of P. 3, O.I, and the break-off from the first myth of 0. 9. These examples confirm that traditional material has intrinsic value in epinician, and suggest the conclusion that the explication of a paradeigmatic relation between myth and victory is not the only valid explan- ation of the function of myth in Pindar. Myth may also serve to provide a publicly acceptable warrant for the praise of the victor. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:46:49Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oxford-uuid:fb1fa986-6226-48e7-86a8-89df6b800669 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | Greek, Ancient (to 1453) English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:46:49Z |
| publishDate | 1993 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:fb1fa986-6226-48e7-86a8-89df6b8006692022-03-27T13:11:30ZMyth and truth in some odes of PindarThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:fb1fa986-6226-48e7-86a8-89df6b800669Criticism and interpretationMythology, Greek, in literatureOdesHistory and criticismGreek, Ancient (to 1453)EnglishPolonsky Theses Digitisation Project1993Mann, RMann, RupertThe main part of this thesis is a survey of Pindar's treatment, in his epinicians, of myths involving the mythological family of the Aiakids. I establish what may be known of Pindar's sources for these stories, and then compare his own accounts. I consider (together with some minor incidents) Aiakos' assist- ance in building the walls of Troy; Phokos' murder; Peleus' experience with Hippolyta and Akastos, and his marriage to Thetis; Telamon's participation in Herakles' expedition against Troy; Achilles' infancy, his combats against Telephos, Kyknos, Hektor and Memnon, and his own fate; Aias' birth and suicide; and finally the story of Neoptolemos' visit to Delphi (chapters 1-7). My major conclusion is that his versions of these myths are more firmly grounded in the mythological tradition than is widely believed: they are constantly allusive, and contain little innovation. What changes there are may be ascribed to a broad rationalizing tendency, rather than to sophisticated poetic purposes. Pindar seems to prefer lesser known, often locally preserved, strands of tradition, but is concerned to produce authoritative accounts of them. The defensive tone of N. 7 may be satisfactorily explained by his care to produce such an account from confused and undignified material; the poem does not contain an apology for a hostile treatment of Neo- ptolemos in Pae.6. In chapter 8, I confirm my conclusions by examining three difficult cases: the myths of P. 3, O.I, and the break-off from the first myth of 0. 9. These examples confirm that traditional material has intrinsic value in epinician, and suggest the conclusion that the explication of a paradeigmatic relation between myth and victory is not the only valid explan- ation of the function of myth in Pindar. Myth may also serve to provide a publicly acceptable warrant for the praise of the victor. |
| spellingShingle | Criticism and interpretation Mythology, Greek, in literature Odes History and criticism Mann, R Mann, Rupert Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar |
| title | Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar |
| title_full | Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar |
| title_fullStr | Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar |
| title_full_unstemmed | Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar |
| title_short | Myth and truth in some odes of Pindar |
| title_sort | myth and truth in some odes of pindar |
| topic | Criticism and interpretation Mythology, Greek, in literature Odes History and criticism |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mannr mythandtruthinsomeodesofpindar AT mannrupert mythandtruthinsomeodesofpindar |