COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
<br/><strong>Background: </strong>Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bias in trials. Despite legislation, guidelines and public commitments on correct reporting from journals, outcome misreporting continues to be prevalent. We aimed...
Main Authors: | Goldacre, B, Drysdale, H, Dale, A, Milosevic, I, Slade, E, Hartley, P, Marston, C, Powell-Smith, A, Heneghan, C, Mahtani, KR |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Similar Items
-
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
by: Ben Goldacre, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials
by: Ben Goldacre, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Outcomes in the trial registry should match those in the protocol
by: Drysdale, H, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Misreported Cancer Deaths in PLATO Trial
by: Victor Serebruany, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Who misreports on internet health surveys, and do images of watching eyes discourage misreporting? An online experiment from China
by: Tianyu Guo, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)