The epistemic costs of compromise in bioethics
Bioethicists sometimes defend compromise positions, particularly when they enter debates on applied topics that have traditionally been highly polarised, such as those regarding abortion, euthanasia and embryonic stem cell research. However, defending compromise positions is often regarded with a de...
Main Authors: | Devolder, K, Douglas, T |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Wiley
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Fritz Jahr’s Bioethical Imperative as Hybrid Epistemics
by: Fernando Lolas Stepke
Published: (2017-03-01) -
DEMOCRACY AS COMPROMISE: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE AGONISTIC VS. EPISTEMIC DIVIDE
by: Gustavo H. Dalaqua
Published: (2020-01-01) -
“The Past Dictates the Future”: Epistemic Ambivalence and the Compromised Ethics of Complicity in Twin Peaks: The Return and Fire Walk with Me
by: Joshua Jones
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Epistemic Theodicy, Epistemic Evil, and Epistemic Responsibility
by: Vojko Strahovnik
Published: (2023-10-01) -
The Internet and ELT: Costs, Gains and Compromises
by: Rebeca Ungureanu
Published: (2013-12-01)