Completeness and consistency of primary outcome reporting in COVID-19 publications in the early pandemic phase: a descriptive study
<p><strong>Background</strong> The COVID-19 pandemic saw a steep increase in the number of rapidly published scientific studies, especially early in the pandemic. Some have suggested COVID-19 trial reporting is of lower quality than typical reports, but there is limited evidence fo...
Main Authors: | Stoll, M, Lindner, S, Marquardt, B, Salholz-Hillel, M, DeVito, NJ, Klemperer, D, Lieb, K |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Similar Items
-
Completeness and consistency of primary outcome reporting in COVID-19 publications in the early pandemic phase: a descriptive study
by: Marlene Stoll, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study
by: Salholz-Hillel, M, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Results availability and timeliness of registered COVID-19 clinical trials: interim cross-sectional results from the DIRECCT study
by: Salholz-Hillel, M, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Catalogue of bias: publication bias
by: Goldacre, B, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Increasing the reporting quality of clinical trials-no easy solutions?
by: DeVito, NJ
Published: (2023)