Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.

Among affluent countries, those with market-liberal welfare regimes (which are also English-speaking) tend to have the highest prevalence of obesity. The impact of cheap, accessible high-energy food is often invoked in explanation. An alternative approach is that overeating is a response to stress...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Offer, A, Pechey, R, Ulijaszek, S
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: Nuffield College (University of Oxford) 2010
_version_ 1797105676285116416
author Offer, A
Pechey, R
Ulijaszek, S
author_facet Offer, A
Pechey, R
Ulijaszek, S
author_sort Offer, A
collection OXFORD
description Among affluent countries, those with market-liberal welfare regimes (which are also English-speaking) tend to have the highest prevalence of obesity. The impact of cheap, accessible high-energy food is often invoked in explanation. An alternative approach is that overeating is a response to stress, and that competition, uncertainty and inequality make market-liberal societies more stressful. This ecological regression meta-study pools 96 body-weight surveys from 11 countries c. 1994-2004. The fast-food ‘shock’ impact is found to work most strongly in market liberal countries. Economic insecurity, measured in several different ways, was almost twice as powerful, while the impact of inequality was weak, and went in the opposite direction.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:50:44Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:fc787218-f3e5-46a1-a0fb-a5f9332c14a7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:50:44Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Nuffield College (University of Oxford)
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:fc787218-f3e5-46a1-a0fb-a5f9332c14a72022-03-27T13:20:57ZObesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.Working paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:fc787218-f3e5-46a1-a0fb-a5f9332c14a7EnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrintsNuffield College (University of Oxford)2010Offer, APechey, RUlijaszek, SAmong affluent countries, those with market-liberal welfare regimes (which are also English-speaking) tend to have the highest prevalence of obesity. The impact of cheap, accessible high-energy food is often invoked in explanation. An alternative approach is that overeating is a response to stress, and that competition, uncertainty and inequality make market-liberal societies more stressful. This ecological regression meta-study pools 96 body-weight surveys from 11 countries c. 1994-2004. The fast-food ‘shock’ impact is found to work most strongly in market liberal countries. Economic insecurity, measured in several different ways, was almost twice as powerful, while the impact of inequality was weak, and went in the opposite direction.
spellingShingle Offer, A
Pechey, R
Ulijaszek, S
Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.
title Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.
title_full Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.
title_fullStr Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.
title_full_unstemmed Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.
title_short Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: The effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality.
title_sort obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes the effect of fast food insecurity and inequality
work_keys_str_mv AT offera obesityunderaffluencevariesbywelfareregimestheeffectoffastfoodinsecurityandinequality
AT pecheyr obesityunderaffluencevariesbywelfareregimestheeffectoffastfoodinsecurityandinequality
AT ulijaszeks obesityunderaffluencevariesbywelfareregimestheeffectoffastfoodinsecurityandinequality