Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
<p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> The study of microbial communities has been revolutionised in recent years by the widespread adoption of culture independent analytical techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics. One potential confound...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
| _version_ | 1797105686535995392 |
|---|---|
| author | Salter, S Cox, M Turek, E Calus, S Cookson, W Moffatt, M Turner, P Parkhill, J Loman, N Walker, A |
| author_facet | Salter, S Cox, M Turek, E Calus, S Cookson, W Moffatt, M Turner, P Parkhill, J Loman, N Walker, A |
| author_sort | Salter, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> The study of microbial communities has been revolutionised in recent years by the widespread adoption of culture independent analytical techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics. One potential confounder of these sequence-based approaches is the presence of contamination in DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents.<br/><br/> <b>Results:</b> In this study we demonstrate that contaminating DNA is ubiquitous in commonly used DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents, varies greatly in composition between different kits and kit batches, and that this contamination critically impacts results obtained from samples containing a low microbial biomass. Contamination impacts both PCR-based 16S rRNA gene surveys and shotgun metagenomics. We provide an extensive list of potential contaminating genera, and guidelines on how to mitigate the effects of contamination.<br/><br/> <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that caution should be advised when applying sequence-based techniques to the study of microbiota present in low biomass environments. Concurrent sequencing of negative control samples is strongly advised. </p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:50:53Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:fc841c5a-c40f-413b-b3e7-31ff43201611 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:50:53Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:fc841c5a-c40f-413b-b3e7-31ff432016112022-03-27T13:21:22ZReagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analysesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fc841c5a-c40f-413b-b3e7-31ff43201611EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2014Salter, SCox, MTurek, ECalus, SCookson, WMoffatt, MTurner, PParkhill, JLoman, NWalker, A <p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> The study of microbial communities has been revolutionised in recent years by the widespread adoption of culture independent analytical techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics. One potential confounder of these sequence-based approaches is the presence of contamination in DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents.<br/><br/> <b>Results:</b> In this study we demonstrate that contaminating DNA is ubiquitous in commonly used DNA extraction kits and other laboratory reagents, varies greatly in composition between different kits and kit batches, and that this contamination critically impacts results obtained from samples containing a low microbial biomass. Contamination impacts both PCR-based 16S rRNA gene surveys and shotgun metagenomics. We provide an extensive list of potential contaminating genera, and guidelines on how to mitigate the effects of contamination.<br/><br/> <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that caution should be advised when applying sequence-based techniques to the study of microbiota present in low biomass environments. Concurrent sequencing of negative control samples is strongly advised. </p> |
| spellingShingle | Salter, S Cox, M Turek, E Calus, S Cookson, W Moffatt, M Turner, P Parkhill, J Loman, N Walker, A Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses |
| title | Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses |
| title_full | Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses |
| title_fullStr | Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses |
| title_short | Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses |
| title_sort | reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence based microbiome analyses |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT salters reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT coxm reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT tureke reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT caluss reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT cooksonw reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT moffattm reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT turnerp reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT parkhillj reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT lomann reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses AT walkera reagentandlaboratorycontaminationcancriticallyimpactsequencebasedmicrobiomeanalyses |