Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings

<p><strong>Background</strong> Malaria accounts for a small fraction of febrile cases in increasingly large areas of the malaria endemic world. Point-of-care tests to improve the management of non-malarial fevers appropriate for primary care are few, consisting of either diagnostic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lubell, Y, Althaus, T, Blacksell, SD, Paris, DH, Mayxay, M, Pan-Ngum, W, White, LJ, Day, NPJ, Newton, PN
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2016
_version_ 1797111984347414528
author Lubell, Y
Althaus, T
Blacksell, SD
Paris, DH
Mayxay, M
Pan-Ngum, W
White, LJ
Day, NPJ
Newton, PN
author_facet Lubell, Y
Althaus, T
Blacksell, SD
Paris, DH
Mayxay, M
Pan-Ngum, W
White, LJ
Day, NPJ
Newton, PN
author_sort Lubell, Y
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background</strong> Malaria accounts for a small fraction of febrile cases in increasingly large areas of the malaria endemic world. Point-of-care tests to improve the management of non-malarial fevers appropriate for primary care are few, consisting of either diagnostic tests for specific pathogens or testing for biomarkers of host response that indicate whether antibiotics might be required. The impact and cost-effectiveness of these approaches are relatively unexplored and methods to do so are not well-developed.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> We model the ability of dengue and scrub typhus rapid tests to inform antibiotic treatment, as compared with testing for elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a biomarker of host-inflammation. Using data on causes of fever in rural Laos, we estimate the proportion of outpatients that would be correctly classified as requiring an antibiotic and the likely cost-effectiveness of the approaches.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Use of either pathogen-specific test slightly increased the proportion of patients correctly classified as requiring antibiotics. CRP testing was consistently superior to the pathogen-specific tests, despite heterogeneity in causes of fever. All testing strategies are likely to result in higher average costs, but only the scrub typhus and CRP tests are likely to be cost-effective when considering direct health benefits, with median cost per disability adjusted life year averted of approximately $48 USD and $94 USD, respectively.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Testing for viral infections is unlikely to be cost-effective when considering only direct health benefits to patients. Testing for prevalent bacterial pathogens can be cost-effective, having the benefit of informing not only whether treatment is required, but also as to the most appropriate antibiotic; this advantage, however, varies widely in response to heterogeneity in causes of fever. Testing for biomarkers of host inflammation is likely to be consistently cost-effective despite high heterogeneity, and can also offer substantial reductions in over-use of antimicrobials in viral infections.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:18:00Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:fd1a1cee-3a13-4de4-9867-12d23aebee8b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:18:00Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:fd1a1cee-3a13-4de4-9867-12d23aebee8b2024-01-10T18:55:16ZModelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settingsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fd1a1cee-3a13-4de4-9867-12d23aebee8bEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2016Lubell, YAlthaus, TBlacksell, SDParis, DHMayxay, MPan-Ngum, WWhite, LJDay, NPJNewton, PN<p><strong>Background</strong> Malaria accounts for a small fraction of febrile cases in increasingly large areas of the malaria endemic world. Point-of-care tests to improve the management of non-malarial fevers appropriate for primary care are few, consisting of either diagnostic tests for specific pathogens or testing for biomarkers of host response that indicate whether antibiotics might be required. The impact and cost-effectiveness of these approaches are relatively unexplored and methods to do so are not well-developed.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> We model the ability of dengue and scrub typhus rapid tests to inform antibiotic treatment, as compared with testing for elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a biomarker of host-inflammation. Using data on causes of fever in rural Laos, we estimate the proportion of outpatients that would be correctly classified as requiring an antibiotic and the likely cost-effectiveness of the approaches.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Use of either pathogen-specific test slightly increased the proportion of patients correctly classified as requiring antibiotics. CRP testing was consistently superior to the pathogen-specific tests, despite heterogeneity in causes of fever. All testing strategies are likely to result in higher average costs, but only the scrub typhus and CRP tests are likely to be cost-effective when considering direct health benefits, with median cost per disability adjusted life year averted of approximately $48 USD and $94 USD, respectively.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Testing for viral infections is unlikely to be cost-effective when considering only direct health benefits to patients. Testing for prevalent bacterial pathogens can be cost-effective, having the benefit of informing not only whether treatment is required, but also as to the most appropriate antibiotic; this advantage, however, varies widely in response to heterogeneity in causes of fever. Testing for biomarkers of host inflammation is likely to be consistently cost-effective despite high heterogeneity, and can also offer substantial reductions in over-use of antimicrobials in viral infections.</p>
spellingShingle Lubell, Y
Althaus, T
Blacksell, SD
Paris, DH
Mayxay, M
Pan-Ngum, W
White, LJ
Day, NPJ
Newton, PN
Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
title Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
title_full Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
title_fullStr Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
title_short Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen-specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
title_sort modelling the impact and cost effectiveness of biomarker tests as compared with pathogen specific diagnostics in the management of undifferentiated fever in remote tropical settings
work_keys_str_mv AT lubelly modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT althaust modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT blacksellsd modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT parisdh modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT mayxaym modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT panngumw modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT whitelj modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT daynpj modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings
AT newtonpn modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofbiomarkertestsascomparedwithpathogenspecificdiagnosticsinthemanagementofundifferentiatedfeverinremotetropicalsettings