Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking
This article presents a detailed ethnographic account of objective practice among professional fact checkers, reporters who specialize in assessing the truth of political claims. Some critics argue that political debate is inherently value-laden and defies objective fact checking; I offer an alterna...
| 第一著者: | |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | Journal article |
| 言語: | English |
| 出版事項: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826306811773321216 |
|---|---|
| author | Graves, L |
| author_facet | Graves, L |
| author_sort | Graves, L |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This article presents a detailed ethnographic account of objective practice among professional fact checkers, reporters who specialize in assessing the truth of political claims. Some critics argue that political debate is inherently value-laden and defies objective fact checking; I offer an alternative view highlighting the practical epistemology revealed in the newswork routines and discourse of working fact checkers. Drawing links between core concepts in the sociology of science and journalism studies, this analysis highlights how in moments of institutional unsettlement, verification relies on factual coherence, rather than straightforward correspondence. To develop this argument, I anatomize a fact check produced as a participant observer with a major national fact-checking organization. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:53:34Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:fd5a5f7c-3880-47fe-9104-3c7113cacd12 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T06:53:34Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:fd5a5f7c-3880-47fe-9104-3c7113cacd122022-03-27T13:28:14ZAnatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checkingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fd5a5f7c-3880-47fe-9104-3c7113cacd12EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2017Graves, LThis article presents a detailed ethnographic account of objective practice among professional fact checkers, reporters who specialize in assessing the truth of political claims. Some critics argue that political debate is inherently value-laden and defies objective fact checking; I offer an alternative view highlighting the practical epistemology revealed in the newswork routines and discourse of working fact checkers. Drawing links between core concepts in the sociology of science and journalism studies, this analysis highlights how in moments of institutional unsettlement, verification relies on factual coherence, rather than straightforward correspondence. To develop this argument, I anatomize a fact check produced as a participant observer with a major national fact-checking organization. |
| spellingShingle | Graves, L Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| title | Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| title_full | Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| title_fullStr | Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| title_short | Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| title_sort | anatomy of a fact check objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gravesl anatomyofafactcheckobjectivepracticeandthecontestedepistemologyoffactchecking |