Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence
Women are under-represented in academic medicine. We aimed to review the empirical evidence base focusing on the reasons for women’s choice or rejection of careers in academic medicine. Using a systematic search strategy, we identified 52 studies published between 1985 and 2015. Over a half had meth...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2016
|
| Summary: | Women are under-represented in academic medicine. We aimed to review the empirical evidence base focusing on the reasons for women’s choice or rejection of careers in academic medicine. Using a systematic search strategy, we identified 52 studies published between 1985 and 2015. Over a half had methodological limitations and most were from North America. Eight main themes had been explored in these studies. There was consistent evidence for four of these: women are interested in teaching more than in research; participation in research can encourage women into academic medicine; women lack adequate mentors and role models; and women experience gender discrimination and bias. The evidence was conflicting on four themes: women are less interested in research than men; women lose commitment to research as their education and training progress; women are deterred from academic careers by financial considerations; and women are deterred by concerns about work-life balance. Inconsistency of findings across studies suggests significant opportunities to overcome barriers by providing a more enabling context. We identified substantial gaps in the scientific literature that could form the focus of future research, including shifting the focus from individuals’ career choices to the societal and organisational contexts and cultures within which those choices are made; extending the evidence base to include a wider range of countries and settings; and testing the efficacy of interventions. |
|---|