Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM

Selective attention biases the encoding and maintenance of representations in visual STM (VSTM). However, precise attentional mechanisms gating encoding and maintenance in VSTM and across development remain less well understood. We recorded EEG while adults and 10-year-olds used cues to guide attent...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: Shimi, A, Kuo, B, Astle, D, Nobre, A, Scerif, G
स्वरूप: Journal article
भाषा:English
प्रकाशित: 2014
_version_ 1826306854444072960
author Shimi, A
Kuo, B
Astle, D
Nobre, A
Scerif, G
author_facet Shimi, A
Kuo, B
Astle, D
Nobre, A
Scerif, G
author_sort Shimi, A
collection OXFORD
description Selective attention biases the encoding and maintenance of representations in visual STM (VSTM). However, precise attentional mechanisms gating encoding and maintenance in VSTM and across development remain less well understood. We recorded EEG while adults and 10-year-olds used cues to guide attention before encoding or while maintaining items in VSTM. Known neural markers of spatial orienting to incoming percepts, that is, Early Directing Attention Negativity, Anterior Directing Attention Negativity, and Late Directing Attention Positivity, were examined in the context of orienting within VSTM. Adults elicited a set of neural markers that were broadly similar in preparation for encoding and during maintenance. In contrast, in children these processes dissociated. Furthermore, in children, individual differences in the amplitude of neural markers of prospective orienting related to individual differences in VSTM capacity, suggesting that children with high capacity are more efficient at selecting information for encoding into VSTM. Finally, retrospective, but not prospective, orienting in both age groups elicited the well-known marker of visual search (N2pc), indicating the recruitment of additional neural circuits when orienting during maintenance. Developmental and individual differences differentiate seemingly similar processes of orienting to perceptually available representations and to representations held in VSTM. © 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:54:12Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:fd91fc37-b585-471a-bd87-cf74da503cef
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:54:12Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:fd91fc37-b585-471a-bd87-cf74da503cef2022-03-27T13:29:45ZAge group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STMJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:fd91fc37-b585-471a-bd87-cf74da503cefEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2014Shimi, AKuo, BAstle, DNobre, AScerif, GSelective attention biases the encoding and maintenance of representations in visual STM (VSTM). However, precise attentional mechanisms gating encoding and maintenance in VSTM and across development remain less well understood. We recorded EEG while adults and 10-year-olds used cues to guide attention before encoding or while maintaining items in VSTM. Known neural markers of spatial orienting to incoming percepts, that is, Early Directing Attention Negativity, Anterior Directing Attention Negativity, and Late Directing Attention Positivity, were examined in the context of orienting within VSTM. Adults elicited a set of neural markers that were broadly similar in preparation for encoding and during maintenance. In contrast, in children these processes dissociated. Furthermore, in children, individual differences in the amplitude of neural markers of prospective orienting related to individual differences in VSTM capacity, suggesting that children with high capacity are more efficient at selecting information for encoding into VSTM. Finally, retrospective, but not prospective, orienting in both age groups elicited the well-known marker of visual search (N2pc), indicating the recruitment of additional neural circuits when orienting during maintenance. Developmental and individual differences differentiate seemingly similar processes of orienting to perceptually available representations and to representations held in VSTM. © 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
spellingShingle Shimi, A
Kuo, B
Astle, D
Nobre, A
Scerif, G
Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM
title Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM
title_full Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM
title_fullStr Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM
title_full_unstemmed Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM
title_short Age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual STM
title_sort age group and individual differences in attentional orienting dissociate neural mechanisms of encoding and maintenance in visual stm
work_keys_str_mv AT shimia agegroupandindividualdifferencesinattentionalorientingdissociateneuralmechanismsofencodingandmaintenanceinvisualstm
AT kuob agegroupandindividualdifferencesinattentionalorientingdissociateneuralmechanismsofencodingandmaintenanceinvisualstm
AT astled agegroupandindividualdifferencesinattentionalorientingdissociateneuralmechanismsofencodingandmaintenanceinvisualstm
AT nobrea agegroupandindividualdifferencesinattentionalorientingdissociateneuralmechanismsofencodingandmaintenanceinvisualstm
AT scerifg agegroupandindividualdifferencesinattentionalorientingdissociateneuralmechanismsofencodingandmaintenanceinvisualstm