L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology

This article examines the use in literary analysis of competing understandings of human psychology emerging from psychoanalysis, cognitive science and evolutionary theory. The validity of each as a model of human nature and as a tool for interpreting literary representations is considered. From this...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
第一著者: Kemp, S
フォーマット: Journal article
言語:English
出版事項: Liverpool University Press 2018
_version_ 1826307086906032128
author Kemp, S
author_facet Kemp, S
author_sort Kemp, S
collection OXFORD
description This article examines the use in literary analysis of competing understandings of human psychology emerging from psychoanalysis, cognitive science and evolutionary theory. The validity of each as a model of human nature and as a tool for interpreting literary representations is considered. From this analysis, a case is made for a pluralist approach in the arts, demonstrating that, despite the mutual antipathy with which psychoanalytic and cognitive critics sometimes regard each other, there is a role for these and other approaches to understanding the representation of the human mind in literature. This is particularly the case, the article argues, where the representation itself forms part of a constructed fictional world that need not entirely mirror the contemporary scientific understanding of our own.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:57:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:feb23be3-afdc-4ffb-969a-3c1917fae85d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:57:42Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Liverpool University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:feb23be3-afdc-4ffb-969a-3c1917fae85d2022-03-27T13:38:38ZL'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychologyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:feb23be3-afdc-4ffb-969a-3c1917fae85dEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordLiverpool University Press2018Kemp, SThis article examines the use in literary analysis of competing understandings of human psychology emerging from psychoanalysis, cognitive science and evolutionary theory. The validity of each as a model of human nature and as a tool for interpreting literary representations is considered. From this analysis, a case is made for a pluralist approach in the arts, demonstrating that, despite the mutual antipathy with which psychoanalytic and cognitive critics sometimes regard each other, there is a role for these and other approaches to understanding the representation of the human mind in literature. This is particularly the case, the article argues, where the representation itself forms part of a constructed fictional world that need not entirely mirror the contemporary scientific understanding of our own.
spellingShingle Kemp, S
L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
title L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
title_full L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
title_fullStr L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
title_full_unstemmed L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
title_short L'Après-Œdipe: the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
title_sort l apres oedipe the future of psychoanalytic criticism in an era of cognitive and evolutionary psychology
work_keys_str_mv AT kemps lapresœdipethefutureofpsychoanalyticcriticisminaneraofcognitiveandevolutionarypsychology