The rule of law case against inconsistency and in favour of mandatory civil legal process
The traditional private, bipolar model of civil litigation has come under strain in a world of mass production and even mass law. The result is that the courts are deciding the same questions of fact or law in multiple proceedings. Multiplicity causes waste and vexation, creates a risk of inconsiste...
Main Author: | Higgins, AA |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Similar Items
-
Inclusion of the Sanctions as the Overriding Mandatory Rules in Referring to the Governing law
by: Esmat Golshani, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Against monism and in favour of an anatomical approach to administrative law
by: Bell, J
Published: (2017) -
Analyzing the Spanish Euthanasia Law: Achievements and inconsistencies of the legal assistance to die
by: Miguel Paradela López, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Legal inconsistency and the emergence of states
by: Barber, N
Published: (2017) -
The inconsistency between civil status and civil registry documents
by: R. MATEFI, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)